- 3,863
I had a client the other day question "why is the maximum break in coverage for pre - ex 63 days?" - My response was "it just is", then later "...blah blah blah HIPAA blah blah blah" and the client kept pushing me WHY? WHY? WHY not 60 days? 90 days? why specifically 63? Client finally asked me "don't you want to know why?".... lol...
So here it is... Specifically with Individual Health Insurance this is a real sticky subject.
-Some states allow individual as credible pre ex with no more than 63 day break in coverage (like Texas new law)
-Some states allow group as credible pre ex but not individual with no more than 63 day break in coverage
-Some carriers allow individual or group as credible pre ex but some do not, with no more than 63 day break in coverage
-Some carriers accept short term as credible, some do not, with no more than 63 day break in coverage
-Some states legislate short term as credible, some do not, with no more than 63 day break in coverage
-Some states don't play the 63 day game at all - they just credit portion of coverage in the past 18 months.
Huge state inconsistencies, even bigger carrier inconsistencies (imagine that...)
And of course my favorite... Clients think if they have no more than a 63 day break they can't be waivered, rated, or even declined.
Short answer - it is a huge mess.
But back to my question - WHY 63 DAYS? Who sat down and said 63 is the magic number - and why? Can anyone educate me on this?
p.s. One final funny note, our new group policy for my employees the carrier said 62 days.... Now I am really scratching my head.
So here it is... Specifically with Individual Health Insurance this is a real sticky subject.
-Some states allow individual as credible pre ex with no more than 63 day break in coverage (like Texas new law)
-Some states allow group as credible pre ex but not individual with no more than 63 day break in coverage
-Some carriers allow individual or group as credible pre ex but some do not, with no more than 63 day break in coverage
-Some carriers accept short term as credible, some do not, with no more than 63 day break in coverage
-Some states legislate short term as credible, some do not, with no more than 63 day break in coverage
-Some states don't play the 63 day game at all - they just credit portion of coverage in the past 18 months.
Huge state inconsistencies, even bigger carrier inconsistencies (imagine that...)
And of course my favorite... Clients think if they have no more than a 63 day break they can't be waivered, rated, or even declined.
Short answer - it is a huge mess.
But back to my question - WHY 63 DAYS? Who sat down and said 63 is the magic number - and why? Can anyone educate me on this?
p.s. One final funny note, our new group policy for my employees the carrier said 62 days.... Now I am really scratching my head.
Last edited: