- 477
I wish NYL had more to offer in its term line, but it's limited. Sometimes it's reasonably competitive and sometimes it's not. I talked to a guy on the phone a while back and his coverage was half the price of NYL term, which obviously disappointed me. Then, another agent ran quotes on 20 year-term at Reliaquote and 9 out of 10 came back higher than NYL. Seems like there is not always a clear indicator here, but like Winter said some companies are known to give decent rates to smokers, or whatever other class of individuals.
NYL offers better conversion features on their term products than some companies do. For example an agent I know well matched a $90 per month 20 year term quote with NYL against an identical face amount 20 year term with another major household name company. The other company was $84 per month, but the conversion privilege said the entire face amount had to be converted into whole life only. The policy was a 500K policy and it's safe to say that the premium for 500K whole life is tight on the monthly budget for many folks. NYL allowed for conversion in smaller amount to WL, UL, or VUL. What policy was best? That depends on what the person wanted, but the bottom line is if someone bought the $84 solely on price because "term is term and price is all that matters" then they were an *** getting advice from another ***. I'm not saying the $6 per month saying was not the right thing to do, cause maybe it was. I'm saying price isn't the only consideration to any insurance policy, the same advice most any DOI web site will give consumers.
The other thing NYL has going for it, when it comes to permanent coverage in whole life, is a pretty strong dividend history. An agent I'm very good friends with was comparing an illustration to a small stock company for WL. Their premium was $200 and NYL was $230. Their policy was paid up in just under 30 years. The NYL policy was paid up in 17 years. I would think the NYL policy was a better buy, but again that's up to the consumer and what he needs. I sold a WL policy to a husband and wife last month, after comparing it with "Snoopy". The NYL policy was like $1.00 per month cheaper for each of them and the dividend projection was only a small percentage better. So I'll give "Snoopy" props for a pretty good dividend projection. They were also considering a WL policy for their children and NYL was $1.25 more per month, but the cash value at maturity and the midpoint was double the competition.
There are other good companies out there and I don't make a living bashing companies. I've already told more than one person that it would be in their best interest to stay with their current company. But I do believe in the strength of the mutual company and its performance for WL products. One question I've posed before that no one has ever been able to answer: What is the advantage, for the consumer, of a stock company over a mutual company?
NYL offers better conversion features on their term products than some companies do. For example an agent I know well matched a $90 per month 20 year term quote with NYL against an identical face amount 20 year term with another major household name company. The other company was $84 per month, but the conversion privilege said the entire face amount had to be converted into whole life only. The policy was a 500K policy and it's safe to say that the premium for 500K whole life is tight on the monthly budget for many folks. NYL allowed for conversion in smaller amount to WL, UL, or VUL. What policy was best? That depends on what the person wanted, but the bottom line is if someone bought the $84 solely on price because "term is term and price is all that matters" then they were an *** getting advice from another ***. I'm not saying the $6 per month saying was not the right thing to do, cause maybe it was. I'm saying price isn't the only consideration to any insurance policy, the same advice most any DOI web site will give consumers.
The other thing NYL has going for it, when it comes to permanent coverage in whole life, is a pretty strong dividend history. An agent I'm very good friends with was comparing an illustration to a small stock company for WL. Their premium was $200 and NYL was $230. Their policy was paid up in just under 30 years. The NYL policy was paid up in 17 years. I would think the NYL policy was a better buy, but again that's up to the consumer and what he needs. I sold a WL policy to a husband and wife last month, after comparing it with "Snoopy". The NYL policy was like $1.00 per month cheaper for each of them and the dividend projection was only a small percentage better. So I'll give "Snoopy" props for a pretty good dividend projection. They were also considering a WL policy for their children and NYL was $1.25 more per month, but the cash value at maturity and the midpoint was double the competition.
There are other good companies out there and I don't make a living bashing companies. I've already told more than one person that it would be in their best interest to stay with their current company. But I do believe in the strength of the mutual company and its performance for WL products. One question I've posed before that no one has ever been able to answer: What is the advantage, for the consumer, of a stock company over a mutual company?