Concern about the longevity of Medicare

Medicare isn't going anywhere.

Gray panthers are the largest voting block and they DO vote. Not all R's, not all D's, but when it comes to Medicare (and SS) they get pissed when the folks in DC try to take away their EARNED benefits they have PAID for over 30 - 40 years or longer.

Any changes to either program will impact FUTURE retirees, most likely those under 50 at the time IF there are revisions.
 
Medicare isn't going anywhere.

Gray panthers are the largest voting block and they DO vote. Not all R's, not all D's, but when it comes to Medicare (and SS) they get pissed when the folks in DC try to take away their EARNED benefits they have PAID for over 30 - 40 years or longer.

Any changes to either program will impact FUTURE retirees, most likely those under 50 at the time IF there are revisions.
Yeah.. and seniors should be the biggest opponents of Medicare for All. To bring everyone into the system would destroy it..
 
The Dems that are pushing Medicare for all do NOT like Medicare Advantage. They see it as taking government tax money and paying it to “for profit” businesses. They have always opposed it.

If they ever get any type of single payer system it will not involve insurance companies. That’s my guess at least.

Im sure it will involve ins companies just not commissions like obama care but worse
 
I wondered how long it would tke you to start Trump bashing. The stock market is constantly setting records, unemployment is at an all time low for blacks, Hispanics and women. He's drawn lines in the sand...an unlike O'bama he backs it up. Trump could cure cancer and give everybody a million dollars and you Dems/Liberals would still complain. :mad:


You know on another forum The same libs that were complaining there is no emergency at the border, They day after he got some funding for the wall they started to complain he is complacent on the immigration issue and why is the wall not built yet:eek::eek::eek:
 
Scary stuff going on with congress’s first-ever hearing on Medicare-for-all. A Republican witness, economist Charles Blahous of the conservative Mercatus Center at George Mason University, said his analysis of earlier Medicare-for-all legislation estimated it would add $32 trillion to $39 trillion to federal health care expenditures. But he agreed with Democrats that most, if not all of that aggregate cost would be offset by the elimination of private health plans.
 
Scary stuff going on with congress’s first-ever hearing on Medicare-for-all. A Republican witness, economist Charles Blahous of the conservative Mercatus Center at George Mason University, said his analysis of earlier Medicare-for-all legislation estimated it would add $32 trillion to $39 trillion to federal health care expenditures. But he agreed with Democrats that most, if not all of that aggregate cost would be offset by the elimination of private health plans.

Huh..............:huh::err:
 
Back
Top