So I (35 year old, minorly over weight male) have bipolar disorder and had all but given up on getting anything other than employer-sponsored default life insurance until I wrote a sob story about how it doesn't affect me at all (I don't suffer from depression and have stable jobs / relationships blah blah), and I got an offer a few months ago I pretty much took without questioning. I'm paying $150/month for 30 year term for 500k of coverage.
So I recently try to warn off the agent trying to sell my wife some insurance that I have a huge uninsurable red flag, but she still insists on taking a shot at me with a sob story etc, and comes back to me with an offer. $90/month for 20 year term for 1 million coverage! I asked if she can do a 30 year but she said their agency does not do 30 year term. She did say she could shop around for a 30 year perhaps, but I'm always hesitant to potentially reopen health information for obvious reasons. She of course also pushed very heavily on some sort of whole plan, but without understandng them more, I'm kind of a "term and invest the rest" type.
From what I could find on typical comparisons between costs of 20 and 30 year plans, the new offer is much better value for the dollar; I just have to be willing to go from 30 year to 20. I have an 8 month old, and we will probably have another child or two. I am the breadwinner by far. But we also have some substantial inheritence, including the big gun, a 401k worth like 600k. So I wonder, do I really need 30 years, and is it worth paying that much for an extra decade of coverage? Do I really even need 20 years of coverage with that kind of rainy day fund?
Sorry for the novel but any advice is appreciated.
So I recently try to warn off the agent trying to sell my wife some insurance that I have a huge uninsurable red flag, but she still insists on taking a shot at me with a sob story etc, and comes back to me with an offer. $90/month for 20 year term for 1 million coverage! I asked if she can do a 30 year but she said their agency does not do 30 year term. She did say she could shop around for a 30 year perhaps, but I'm always hesitant to potentially reopen health information for obvious reasons. She of course also pushed very heavily on some sort of whole plan, but without understandng them more, I'm kind of a "term and invest the rest" type.
From what I could find on typical comparisons between costs of 20 and 30 year plans, the new offer is much better value for the dollar; I just have to be willing to go from 30 year to 20. I have an 8 month old, and we will probably have another child or two. I am the breadwinner by far. But we also have some substantial inheritence, including the big gun, a 401k worth like 600k. So I wonder, do I really need 30 years, and is it worth paying that much for an extra decade of coverage? Do I really even need 20 years of coverage with that kind of rainy day fund?
Sorry for the novel but any advice is appreciated.