One of the reasons I mentioned the issue in the first place is because a forum member and former forum moderator who is a trainer for a large IMO emphasized the issue in his weekly webinar today. They seemed to think there was enough potential for actions against agents to stress caution to their own agents about how they choose to speak about Plans C, F, and HDF to their clients and prospects.
Sure, they don't want to get sued. I get it and would do the same on that level. I'm more addressing where this information is coming from, not how agents are reacting to it.
Had I not witnessed first hand a compliance officer of a top carrier/organization and her/their very clear agenda 4 years ago on this I wouldn't have this opinion. They are far less worried about agents saying the wrong thing than they are losing their most beloved treasure. The almighty dollar. It's a spin with an alleged noble cause, as they all are. "Protect the consumer, we love the consumer." It's working hook, line, and sinker.
Bonus: One might consider...which carrier likely has the most Plan F policy holders in force with the most to lose?