HR6331 in a nutshell ...

AgentOrange

Super Genius
1000 Post Club
H.R. 6331, the "Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act of 2008,"​

Both the Senate and the House of Representatives voted on Tuesday, July 15, 2008, to override the presidential veto of H.R. 6331, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008.

Most press reports describe H.R. 6331 as a bill that cancels the pay cuts to doctors that went into effect on July 1, but the bill also contains improvements for Medicare beneficiaries. While these improvements are much more modest than the improvements included in legislation passed by the House of Representatives last year, they are still significant and will provide relief to many older people and people with disabilities. A Summary of Provisions in H.R. 6331 Relevant to Medicare Beneficiaries
As indicated, H.R. 6331 contains a number of provisions that make improvements for Medicare beneficiaries. The Center will issue an Alert that discusses the provisions in more detail if and when H.R. 6331 is enacted into law.
Relevant sections provide:
1. Provisions for Low-Income Individuals
  • QI program: Extends the QI program through December 31, 2009, and increases funding for the program.
  • Low-income subsidy (LIS) and Medicare Savings Program (MSP): Effective 2010, increases the assets test for MSP to the LIS asset level for full subsidy individuals. This change includes indexing the MSP asset test for the first time since the program was authorized in 1986.
  • MSP applications: SSA is directed to provide LIS applications and information about MSPs to individuals potentially eligible for such subsidies, to provide assistance with applications, and to share LIS application information with states such that the receipt by the state of such information initiates an application for MSP.
  • Out -of -pocket expenses: Limits cost-sharing for beneficiaries who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and who enroll in Special Needs Plans to the cost-sharing under Medicaid.
  • Late enrollment penalty: Eliminates the Part D late enrollment penalty for LIS-eligible individuals.
  • Eliminates estate recovery: Eliminates the authority for states to collect from estates of deceased beneficiaries the amounts paid to MSP recipients.
  • Changes to definitions of income and resources for LIS: Exempts value of life insurance policy (resources) and in-kind support and maintenance (income).
  • Judicial review of LIS decisions: Provides for a right to federal court review
  • Translation of model form: The model MSP application must be translated into languages most frequently used by Medicare beneficiaries and made available to states.
  • Assistance to SHIPs and Area Agencies on Aging: Provides additional funding, some of which is targeted to LIS outreach.
2. Part A and Part B Provisions:
  • Extension of exceptions process for therapy caps: The process is extended until December 31, 2009.
  • Durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies (DMEPOS): Delays for 18 months implementation of the competitive bidding acquisition process for DMEPOS, which went into effect in 10 areas on July 1, and modifies the competitive bidding process.
  • Improvements to preventive services: The Secretary can use the national coverage determination process to add coverage of new preventive services. The "Welcome to Medicare" physical is extended from 6 months to 1 year, and the deductible does not apply.
  • Mental health services: Decreases over 6 years the coinsurance for mental health services to the 20% coinsurance rate for other Medicare services.
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other conditions: Includes coverage of intensive cardiac rehabilitation programs and repeals transfer of ownership of oxygen equipment
  • Medigap: Requires implementation of modifications made by NAIC to the standard Medigap plans. The modifications contain restructuring of current benefit packages.
3. Part C and Part D Provisions:
  • Prohibitions and limitations on marketing of Medicare Advantage (MA) and prescription drug (PDP) plans: Prohibits door-to-door sales, cold calling, cross selling of non-health-related products. Requires limitations on commissions and gifts, and requires agents to abide by state appointment laws. Some provisions would be effective in time for the 2008 Annual Enrollment Period.
  • Phase-out of indirect medical education (IME): Phases out an adjustment to MA payment rates for IME, but continues to pay teaching hospitals directly for their higher patient care costs.
    NOTE: This provision is the only adjustment to Medicare Advantage payment rates. It adopts a recommendation of the Medicare Advisory Payment Committee (MedPAC) to eliminate these duplicate payments.​
  • Private Fee-for-Services (PFFS) changes: Requires PFFS plans in counties where there are two HMOs or PPOs to form networks of providers, beginning in 2011. Also requires PFFS plans, effective 2010, to have the same quality improvement programs as local PPOs.
  • Special Needs Plans (SNPs): Extends the authority of SNPs and the moratorium on new SNPs through December 31, 2010. Includes new eligibility and care management requirements and quality reporting standards.
  • Coverage of barbiturates and benzodiazepines: Permits coverage under Part D of barbiturates (for certain conditions) and benzodiazepines, effective January 1, 2012.
  • Protected classes of drugs: Codifies current guidance concerning coverage of "protected classes" of drugs under Part D and authorizes modification of the protected classes through rulemaking.
  • Medically accepted indication for drugs: Authorizes Medicare to revise the compendia used for identifying medically accepted indication for Part D drugs, and provides that the criteria for anticancer drugs covered under Part D should be the same as the criteria for anticancer drugs covered under Part B.
The Center for Medicare Advocacy will provide provide further analysis of H.R. 6331.
http://www.medicareadvocacy.org/Reform_08_07.10.HR6331.htm#_ednref1 Senator McCain was not present for the vote.
[ii] The Senate Glossary defines many of the terms used to discuss pending legislation and Senate procedures. http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/b_three_sections_with_teasers/glossary.htm
[iii] Senate Majority Leader Reid (D. Nev.) changed his vote from yes to no in order to be able to ask that the Senate reconsider the cloture vote on H.R. 6331.
 
Well I think I have an idea to Market MA plans to our MA "prospects" and still be within the rules... I would like to see what some of you other guys come up with first...
 
Medigap: Requires implementation of modifications made by NAIC to the standard Medigap plans. The modifications contain restructuring of current benefit packages.
This is interesting because I believe it will eliminate the at-home recover and maybe the preventive benefit. It would render Plan J the same as Plan F, therebye eliminating a crappy plan.

Rick
 
Last edited:
I have already talked to other agents and agency owners about how to get around the marketing rules this next AEP...still looking...

The main problem that I see happening is the flood of direct mail coming to a seniors home. While a cold call is out, reply cards are one way around that. So now everyone and their brother is going to be doing that...

Yes, I am here...I know I have not posted in a long time...just been reading here and there...
 
Well I think I have an idea to Market MA plans to our MA "prospects" and still be within the rules... I would like to see what some of you other guys come up with first...

That is a very smooth way of getting information. No wonder you are so successful at what you do. :)

This is my contribution:

"Hi Mrs. Smith, my name is Frank and I'm calling to bring you up to date on the prohibitions and limitations the government has placed on insurance agents when marketing Medicare Advantage (MA) and prescription drug (PDP) plans.

This is critical information that you need to be aware of.

If you would like to learn more you can call me back toll-free at 555-121-1234.

I don't like it either but now it's your turn. ;)
 
This is interesting because I believe it will eliminate the at-home recover and maybe the preventive benefit. It would render Plan J the same as Plan F, therebye eliminating a crappy plan.

Rick

They need to eliminate Plan C also. It is just as crappy, if not more so, than Plan J.
 
Back
Top