Iowa Wellmark: 40% Increase, One Patient Costing them $12 Million/year

In the beginning, people said the lifting of the annual/lifetime maximums would only have a 1-2% increase in rates. Another fallacy......

My BX rep said they have "MANY" people that have already blown thru their OLD $5 million old lifetime caps under PRE-ACA plans
 
This is surprising to me. I was one of the people who said that the unlimited maximum would make minimal difference in rates. Obviously, I was wrong. I have heard from reps that the number of transplants spiked after Obamacare. I have also heard that the utilization levels on ACA-compliant IFP are much higher than similar ACA-compliant group plans, and certainly higher than the gfathered/gmothered IFP plans.
 
Situations like this make me question, "what's a human life worth"?

IMO, your life is worth whatever you're willing to pay for it. If you can't afford to pay for it, your worth to society is equal to your contribution.

I'd assume someone with a genetic disorder that requires a million dollars a month in medical costs isn't contributing much to society, which begs the question of whether society is responsible for paying to keep this person alive.
 
Ray, Pose that great question to Trump, I'm sure he'll retweet it and start another media frenzy. (or a national discussion)

Ann, I think carriers and industry articles were saying the same thing.
 
This is surprising to me. I was one of the people who said that the unlimited maximum would make minimal difference in rates. Obviously, I was wrong. I have heard from reps that the number of transplants spiked after Obamacare. I have also heard that the utilization levels on ACA-compliant IFP are much higher than similar ACA-compliant group plans, and certainly higher than the gfathered/gmothered IFP plans.

I think the move to unlimited on group made minimal difference in rates.

Its the move to unlimited on Indy, when previously people who "needed" insurance were denied coverage, that has caused the spike on the Indy side. Remember, most high risk pools had a $1 million max, so that kicked them off the transplant list, too.

My understanding is that the carriers (and providers) knew the transplant spike wpuld occur and the reinsurance was supposed to offset it. But we all know how that went.....
 
In the beginning, people said the lifting of the annual/lifetime maximums would only have a 1-2% increase in rates. Another fallacy......

My BX rep said they have "MANY" people that have already blown thru their OLD $5 million old lifetime caps under PRE-ACA plans

The UNICARE company increased their lifetime cap from $5 million to $7 million as a marketing ploy. The next year, they suddenly reset it back to $5 million, and then went bankrupt about 9 months later. I think this was 2008.

$1 Million a month in medical care is amazing. And you have to believe that the insurance company worked really hard to negotiate it down to that figure. Wow.
 
Situations like this make me question, "what's a human life worth"?

IMO, your life is worth whatever you're willing to pay for it. If you can't afford to pay for it, your worth to society is equal to your contribution.

I'd assume someone with a genetic disorder that requires a million dollars a month in medical costs isn't contributing much to society, which begs the question of whether society is responsible for paying to keep this person alive.

My 14 month old daughter has a rare genetic disorder that's running about $40,000/month. She's due for brain surgery in 13 days.
 
Back
Top