- 120
I have heard conflicting information on this and would like to know what everyone here thinks.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. Better to not know you have cancer and just die.I would not want to be responsible for encouraging someone to take a test which could put information in their medical records which would cause an insurance company to deny some type of insurance coverage in the future.
I would not want to be responsible for encouraging someone to take a test which could put information in their medical records which would cause an insurance company to deny some type of insurance coverage in the future.
I agree. Better to not know you have cancer and just die.
Which med supp carriers deny based on genetics pre-disposition tests, exactly?
Let's not confuse genetic predisposition tests and pathological tumor examinations.I agree. Better to not know you have cancer and just die.
Not a problem, when it's done correctly and referred by the Medicare beneficiaries personal physician who has determined that the test would be beneficial. But when a bunch of agents or other people gather the swabs from random regular Medicare beneficiaries and submit them to a Teledoc who has no relationship with the patient and the agent receives payment for that referral it becomes Medicare Fraud!If an Insurance carrier will pay for such tests - why not?
Not a problem, when it's done correctly and referred by the Medicare beneficiaries personal physician who has determined that the test would be beneficial. But when a bunch of agents or other people gather the swabs from random regular Medicare beneficiaries and submit them to a Teledoc who has no relationship with the patient and the agent receives payment for that referral it becomes Medicare Fraud!