62 Year Old Offered UL Instead of FE

Southpaw

Expert
30
ARIZONA
A 62 year old I have was offered a cheaper Universal Life policy with a power premium than my best Final Expense. I have never sold UL but have heard of some calling for higher premium later or running out and cancelling. Is my only answer that FE is stable for price and face amount?
 
Depends on how it was structured. Some have a continuation rider -to keep in mind, which in my opinion defeats the purpose or a purpose of having a UL but not bad none the less. Based on illustrations alone they do ok and last pretty long, but once again depending on how and what numbers are used.

That would be a good start but what are his goals or objective? Is he looking for just FE?
From what you posted alone, cheap and UL doesn't quite go hand in hand. At least to me it doesn't.

Hopefully one of the FE guys can chime in.
 
A 62 year old I have was offered a cheaper Universal Life policy with a power premium than my best Final Expense. I have never sold UL but have heard of some calling for higher premium later or running out and cancelling. Is my only answer that FE is stable for price and face amount?

UL policies are flexible premium. So yes they will always be lower. They can pay any amount they want to.

If they want it to be guaranteed they need whole life or possibly GUL if they want a larger policy. But regular UL is not for people who don't understand UL. They may as well be flushing their money down a toilet.
 
A 62 year old I have was offered a cheaper Universal Life policy with a power premium than my best Final Expense. I have never sold UL but have heard of some calling for higher premium later or running out and cancelling. Is my only answer that FE is stable for price and face amount?
Your client was probably sold "Guaranteed Universal Life" policy, meaning that if they pay the minimum premium, it's guaranteed not to lapse. The guarantee can be anywhere from just a few years, or up to a certain age (like age 90 or 100, or maybe 121). The problem is, though, if they miss just one premium payment they may lose the no-lapse guarantee. Same thing can happen if they access the cash value through loan or withdrawal. For most FE clients, this is a ticking time bomb!

Here's a blog post by a broker explaining the pros and cons (see con #3 for what I just described): https://www.rootfin.com/guaranteed-universal-life-insurance-pros-and-cons/
 
I would agree it was probably had a no lapse guarantee on it. I sell two different type ul one has a no lapse guarantee rider and the other I refer to it as a permanent term policy.
 
Can, may, could.

For final expenses or "final expense market"?

I have GULs on the books that have missed payment, taken loans, reduced face amounts and still maintained the guarantee.

When comparing GUL and SIWL plans you need to put the same premium into the GUL as the SIWL plan. To do a closer apples to apples. IMHO.

GUL is not appropriate for some people same as a WL plan with 4 tables built in is not appropriate for some.

Some GULs may have more guarantees and safe guards than some FE plans.

I have written GULs on 70 year olds and FE on 20 year olds. Both were appropriate.
 
A good GUL will always be lower priced since they're usually fully underwritten. Unless the customer is looking for $50,000 or more which is usually a minimum threshhold, I don't mention UL's.
 
A good GUL will always be lower priced since they're usually fully underwritten. Unless the customer is looking for $50,000 or more which is usually a minimum threshhold, I don't mention UL's.

Sagicor is non med up to 65 and goes down to $25,000. Can be approved in minutes. They also have a Rated GUL. In the t3-t4 range.
 
Back
Top