Democrats’ proposal would ruin Medicare Part D

Northeast Agent

Guru
1000 Post Club
2,055
Pennsylvania
Democrats’ proposal would ruin Medicare Part D

The numbers show Republicans were right. When fully implemented in 2006, the actual average premium was not the $35 peg-plus-one-year-of-inflation the Democrats projected, but $32 — a 14% savings from the original projection. Since then, the market has kept the average premium exactly in line with overall, ordinary inflation in the economy, rather than with the much higher rate of healthcare inflation in the intervening years. The $32 monthly in 2006, adjusted for overall inflation, is the almost-exact equivalent of the $42 monthly premium in force for 2020.
 
Those of us who work the Medicare market know this.

It's not the premium that matters, it's the cost of your drugs.

The numb nuts at CMS that gave us a new Plan Finder for 2020 set the default to show the lowest premium. The original version didn't even run a total for premium + drugs and no one noticed until AGENTS were allowed to preview the new PF.

At least one agent (@WCMason ) can attest, when you call 800-MEDICARE to get advice on Part D you may find the tool on the other end of the phone arguing that the best plan for you is the one with the lowest premium.

#QuinHillyer that penned this article for the Examiner that the Dem proposal for Part D would raise premiums, and it may well do that. But Rx copay's have been increasing substantially over the last few years and there is no end in sight.
 
Back
Top