I have been studying for my exams to become a registered rep selling securities, but I have begun to wonder if insurance would not be a better route to go. I see at least three advantages for insurance:
1. Larger base of potential clients. Everyone needs insurance. Not everyone has money to invest. Both require a lot of energy prospecting, but I am guessing selling securites requires more cold calling.
2. Regular income from existing clients. Most insurance customers renew their policies. There do not seem to be a lot of trailing commissions in the securities business, so not much income from existing clients unless you are constantly changing their investments.
3. Less online competition. Full service financial advisors can not compete with online stock commissions around $10, but when I have requested an online quote from Geico it has always been higher than quotes from local agents!
Any thoughts anyone?
1. Larger base of potential clients. Everyone needs insurance. Not everyone has money to invest. Both require a lot of energy prospecting, but I am guessing selling securites requires more cold calling.
2. Regular income from existing clients. Most insurance customers renew their policies. There do not seem to be a lot of trailing commissions in the securities business, so not much income from existing clients unless you are constantly changing their investments.
3. Less online competition. Full service financial advisors can not compete with online stock commissions around $10, but when I have requested an online quote from Geico it has always been higher than quotes from local agents!
Any thoughts anyone?