I hope to get some advise from someone who might have experience in a similar situation.
I was involved in a three car rear-ended accident. The third car in the back of me hit the car behind me and pushed it into my car. There was no bodily injury, just property (car) damage.
It was determined to be the third car's driver's fault as he hit the middle car and pushed it into my car. However, he only has limited coverage, and apparently with the minimum of $5,000 property damage.
The total damage to the two cars are more than the policy limit of $5,000.
How should the insurance company determine to compensate my car and the middle car? Would this be a 50/50 split? I was told that it might come down to the car that suffered the heavier damage will get a higher compensation. Does anyone know if there is any legal precedent or guideline in determining the compensation in a case like this?
Thanks in advance.
I was involved in a three car rear-ended accident. The third car in the back of me hit the car behind me and pushed it into my car. There was no bodily injury, just property (car) damage.
It was determined to be the third car's driver's fault as he hit the middle car and pushed it into my car. However, he only has limited coverage, and apparently with the minimum of $5,000 property damage.
The total damage to the two cars are more than the policy limit of $5,000.
How should the insurance company determine to compensate my car and the middle car? Would this be a 50/50 split? I was told that it might come down to the car that suffered the heavier damage will get a higher compensation. Does anyone know if there is any legal precedent or guideline in determining the compensation in a case like this?
Thanks in advance.