Wondering if anyone has developed a good way of dealing with this.
I imagine this isn't just a California problem but we are starting to see a resurgence of mortgage copanies requiring an Evidence of Insurance well before escrow even closes. Saw it 2-3 years ago when there was a lot of buyers buying the bank owned properties and you had multiple potential buyers involved and the bank was, presumedly, trying to make sure the money losing offer they were gonna take wouldn't fall through after they had dismissed the other buyer(s).
Yes, they have no insurable interest and I would talk to them until I was blue in the face but they wouldn't budge. Soooo, our primary carrier let us flat-can if the deal fell through. Then it went away, like they realized how stupid it was, but now we have seen a few more cases in recent weeks, two of them on NON-bank owned properties.
If we use a different carrier (usually for underwriting reasons) that has minimum earned premiums and won't flat-can, obviously that is a problem. For those we have taken to requiring the policy be paid for by the applicant, disclosing all of the potential pitfalls of the deal falls through. In two cases, we lost the business to local captives who will write anything that comes across their desk (hence the underwriting isn't an issue for them) whose carrier will flat-can.
Anyone here devised an effective strategy for these situations?
I imagine this isn't just a California problem but we are starting to see a resurgence of mortgage copanies requiring an Evidence of Insurance well before escrow even closes. Saw it 2-3 years ago when there was a lot of buyers buying the bank owned properties and you had multiple potential buyers involved and the bank was, presumedly, trying to make sure the money losing offer they were gonna take wouldn't fall through after they had dismissed the other buyer(s).
Yes, they have no insurable interest and I would talk to them until I was blue in the face but they wouldn't budge. Soooo, our primary carrier let us flat-can if the deal fell through. Then it went away, like they realized how stupid it was, but now we have seen a few more cases in recent weeks, two of them on NON-bank owned properties.
If we use a different carrier (usually for underwriting reasons) that has minimum earned premiums and won't flat-can, obviously that is a problem. For those we have taken to requiring the policy be paid for by the applicant, disclosing all of the potential pitfalls of the deal falls through. In two cases, we lost the business to local captives who will write anything that comes across their desk (hence the underwriting isn't an issue for them) whose carrier will flat-can.
Anyone here devised an effective strategy for these situations?