Rebuilding the SSA Code Base

somarco

GA Medicare Expert
5000 Post Club
38,006
Atlanta
Social Security systems contain tens of millions of lines of code written in COBOL, an archaic programming language. Safely rewriting that code would take years—DOGE wants it done in months.

The so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is starting to put together a team to migrate the Social Security Administration's (SSA) computer systems entirely off one of its oldest programming languages in a matter of months, potentially putting the integrity of the system—and the benefits on which tens of millions of Americans rely—at risk.

In 2017, SSA announced a plan to receive hundreds of millions in funding to replace its core systems. The agency predicted that it would take around five years to modernize these systems.

As recently as 2016, SSA's infrastructure contained more than 60 million lines of code written in COBOL, with millions more written in other legacy coding languages, the agency's Office of the Inspector General found. In fact, SSA's core programmatic systems and architecture haven't been "substantially" updated since the 1980s when the agency developed its own database system called MADAM

"This is an environment that is held together with bail wire and duct tape," the former senior SSA technologist working in the office of the chief information officer tells WIRED. "The leaders need to understand that they're dealing with a house of cards or Jenga. If they start pulling pieces out, which they've already stated they're doing, things can break."

 
Honestly asking, what do you want them to do? Leave it as is?

If they don't get it done in the first 2 years, and Democrats win more seats, it could be stuck in limbo and not get completely accomplished. It sounds like it need to be done to me.
 
Im imaging a scenario where they are updating the data, and they accidentally erase it. Oops

Most likely have redundant backup systems for data.

I would also imagine the new programming involves new/upgraded hardware. Mainframe computers are still used by large financial industries and government.

COBOL is still used independently or alongside companion languages like Assembler, Java, C, C++ and others.
 
Most likely have redundant backup systems for data.
Well .......

How often have you been surprised with clients or insurance carriers not pursuing what you might consider to be logical actions?

:laugh:

(You get some pints (oops Points) for not making an absolute statement)
 
Well .......

How often have you been surprised with clients or insurance carriers not pursuing what you might consider to be logical actions?

:laugh:

(You get some pints (oops Points) for not making an absolute statement)
I would suspect that the federal government, back when they had employees to do this like a month ago, likely had more than one backup. As the programs they are using are archaic likely they have had more than one catastrophe in the past where they had to use their back up. I know in college IT classes they teach about having multiple backups and not all in one place.
 
Back
Top