- 14,808
We had a post here not too long ago about how agents can help their clients. Since this happened about 1 minute ago I figured I'd post it.
My client is an attorney and his wife fell in their house. Days later her knee swelled and after a MRI the diagnosis was a torn meniscus. Surgery followed and total charges were just over $10,000.
After a claims review it was denied due to it being pre-existing. Client called claims dep't and claims said they had the doctor records and the claim is in fact declined. Now, the wife didn't have any pre-ex conditions and this was an accident, so how could it be pre-existing?
Well, as an attorney he was ready to "sue everyone" - including possibly me. But he had my February newletter so he decided to call me. He also had the doctor records which he faxed me.
The problem, as it turns out, was a wrong date of the accident. The doctor mistakely put that the accident occured in Feb of 2006, but they didn't have coverage then. They didn't get covered until a few months later. So the company, thinking the accident occured before coverage began simply declined the claim.
The doctor admitted his error - I called claims and let them know the scoop. The doctor is faxing a letter correcting his mistake and the claim should be paid within 10 days.
Staying out of touch would have meant my client probably would have lost my number and just dealt with claims. Claims had no way of knowing the doctor's records were incorrect so they just kept telling the client "it's pre-existing." The actual error probably wouldn't have been caught until a lawsuit was filed.
A lot of BS avoided. Now instead of having a pissed client and a policy lapse I have a thrilled client who's gonna be on the books forever. And by the way, the first full 5 minutes of the conversation was him chewing me out.
My client is an attorney and his wife fell in their house. Days later her knee swelled and after a MRI the diagnosis was a torn meniscus. Surgery followed and total charges were just over $10,000.
After a claims review it was denied due to it being pre-existing. Client called claims dep't and claims said they had the doctor records and the claim is in fact declined. Now, the wife didn't have any pre-ex conditions and this was an accident, so how could it be pre-existing?
Well, as an attorney he was ready to "sue everyone" - including possibly me. But he had my February newletter so he decided to call me. He also had the doctor records which he faxed me.
The problem, as it turns out, was a wrong date of the accident. The doctor mistakely put that the accident occured in Feb of 2006, but they didn't have coverage then. They didn't get covered until a few months later. So the company, thinking the accident occured before coverage began simply declined the claim.
The doctor admitted his error - I called claims and let them know the scoop. The doctor is faxing a letter correcting his mistake and the claim should be paid within 10 days.
Staying out of touch would have meant my client probably would have lost my number and just dealt with claims. Claims had no way of knowing the doctor's records were incorrect so they just kept telling the client "it's pre-existing." The actual error probably wouldn't have been caught until a lawsuit was filed.
A lot of BS avoided. Now instead of having a pissed client and a policy lapse I have a thrilled client who's gonna be on the books forever. And by the way, the first full 5 minutes of the conversation was him chewing me out.