- 1,581
Good point. I can definitely see the owner of a driverless car still needing coverage - whether it is an individual or the owner of a fleet of ride-hailed vehicles. Doubt the cars will automatically drive themselves in for service whenever it's needed without the owner's "permission" - not to mention reluctance to pay for recommended (or even required) new parts (i.e.: tires, brake pads).
So many issues still - driverless car with worn tires slides on snowy road, or hydroplanes on wet road, hits something. If owner would have maintained the vehicle to prohibit it operating with balding tires...etc.
Premiums for owners of autonomous vehicles would still likely be a fraction of current rate, but insurers can "double-dip" by having this along with the manufacturer having to maintain liability coverage.
Interesting times coming in the auto insurance market.
Curiously, what experience do you have w/ insurance distribution? Sales? Don't think so. Carrier rep...ehh don't think so? Just curious what background you come from...or do you just push content to drum up conversation here w/ no personal stake in any of it?