Buying a STRUCTERED SETTLEMENT cash flow

The video also, very specifically and quite extensively, discusses that one advantage of the product for a consumer and their financial advisor is a more limited application of suitability concerns to the purchase than there would be in an annuity purchase situation.

I am starting to hear the word "fit" enough that I am beginning to question whether or not that is a real life practice in the sale or purchase of an SMA product.

There is another side to the concern of fit.

I have been drooling over SMA listings on a vendors website for a couple of years so I am very generally informed of their concept of providing a "cash flow" or a "chunk of change" to a purchaser. So as a prospective purchaser of an SMA product, I come up with 2 suitability questions of my own.

--- Is a structured financial settlement, slangily referred to as an SMA, a legitimate financial product?

(I have considered asking about that here a few times in the last 24 months, but have never done so.)

--- Is the particular SMA salesperson interviewed in the podcast, and to whom I have been referred, an honest and reputable person with whom to do business?

(One of the reasons I did not earn enough money while working to have HNW levels of financial resources in retirement is that I never was able to get the skills of managing and directing and effectively working with people. It is most fascinating that I have had to make crash efforts along those lines in the past months in order to fulfull ethical responsibilities I have to others relating to dealing with my family's financial situations. I have failed more than succeeded, but have made some progress.)
 
Why not just look at regular annuities (SPIAs, DIAs, FIAs w lifetime income, etc)?

You can look around for secondary market annuities (which may include structured settlements). Google should have results for that term.

They're like bonds where there is an inventory available. Payouts are all over the place. Are you insurance licensed? You still need to have an agent involved.
I don't know about SPIA's and DIA's.

I am pretty sure there are differences between the lifetime income rider products I own and the SMA I have an offer for.

The income rider provides income based on an imaginary amount of money for an uncertain period of time. The SMA provides a return of lump sums of money on specific dates or a flow of money over a specified range of dates having nothing to do with the life span of the purchaser. The SMA is based on a real sum of money, not an imaginary one.
 
I don't know about SPIA's and DIA's.

I am pretty sure there are differences between the lifetime income rider products I own and the SMA I have an offer for.

The income rider provides income based on an imaginary amount of money for an uncertain period of time. The SMA provides a return of lump sums of money on specific dates or a flow of money over a specified range of dates having nothing to do with the life span of the purchaser. The SMA is based on a real sum of money, not an imaginary one.
I really don't know what you're trying to communicate here but SPIAs and DIAs don't have those types of riders or imaginary amounts of money.
 
I really don't know what you're trying to communicate here but SPIAs and DIAs don't have those types of riders or imaginary amounts of money.
I thought you were suggesting to op that might consider those three types of annuities as alternatives to the structured cash flow.

What I was trying to say was that I don't know about SPIAs and DIAs, but the SMA and the income rider have different characteristics and I think the SMA could be superior to the income rider -- depending on specific needs -- so the structured payments (regardless of tax concerns) might be the better option for the op.
 
Back
Top