- 5,058
A member over at IHIAA put in some test leads,and he say he got calls from Ehealth.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like HTQ's has some really, really nice people... You guys give some great endorsements.
But why do their leads suck so bad...? (actually I don't know if they do or not, I couldn't get past some of the inflexibility and lack of filtering, all things that I did not like about their life ins leads.) So hence, I am NOT a customer.
But they have some super nice people, from the sound of it.
If you pay for filters for uninsurable conditions then those leads that slip through should be credited. Trying to weasel out of a credit by saying the other spouse is insurable and besides, you can always pick up an AOR is unacceptable. It is not always possible to peel off the insurable spouse and leave the other behind. AOR's are almost impossible to pick up with some carriers and not even in the cards when the current coverage is an employer group plan.
Hunter shared with me the stats on eHealth revenue and while I don't recall the exact figures, it was very small . . .perhaps 1% or less of their income. If that 1% results in adding more phone sharks to the mix from eHealth then it is counter-productive to say they are catering to the agent.
Really? What filter do we not have? I thought we had too many filters if there was such a thing. Please let me know if we need to add something. Not saying we can do it and I am not asking you to try us if we do add it...just trying to learn.
Hmm...alright. I am willing to admit that maybe we got some bad info. I am a P & C guy (or at least I used to be) so please educate me. It was my understanding that Health Insurance is not like Auto Insurance where one uninsurable person taints the whole house. I have been told that you can write a Major Medical policy on individual regardless of the medical condition of their spouse (or other member of the HH). Please chime in if this isn't right. If it is only right part of the time explain that to me too. I don't know what I don't know. When we made this change I thought it was a win, win, win. Agents get more leads where they can REALLY help the consumer (by educating them and showing them their options), the consumer gets an agent that can explain how things work and we lower the amount of leads we had a hard time monetizing due to one person having a med condition.
On initial data harvesting they do not even ask for phone number. Other lead companies do not pass through phone numbers either to my knowledge.
You must have requested an application and provided additional data? That is my only thought.
Maybe they started doing courtesy calls when they figured out how few actually complete from start to finish?
It will take a special agent to handle complex cases like that. Further, not all states will follow the same regulations and that effects the options the agent can offer. Until then, you might want to switch back to the way you had it prior. I can't say that any lead provider has ever made it work. Most of the time, the family want's to get uniform coverage even if they aren't required to do so. No one likes to exclude a family member.