Just curious if some of the life/health only agents follow the same advice they give. As a life/health agent we/I always recommend that my clients have an actual "agent"(me!) to use as a resource when making decisions regarding coverages, claims, etc.... But do we also take the same advice when it comes to our own property & casualty coverages.
The reason I am asking is I am currently insured with State Farm for my auto and home. I was doing some research online and found a couple of other company's that provided the same coverage for a lower premium. I went in to talk to my local agent about changing and he made the same sales pitch that I would have made about having a local agent who knows the area, personal relationships, etc.
So, I have not changed my coverage because I do feel like an personal hometown agent can be a very valuable benefit. Is it worth it to pay more for that service? If I am the agent, then YES!
So, how does everyone else feel about this? And if you don't mind being with a company that you have to call the 800# and talk with another representative, why don't you feel your clients shouldn't do the same thing??
The reason I am asking is I am currently insured with State Farm for my auto and home. I was doing some research online and found a couple of other company's that provided the same coverage for a lower premium. I went in to talk to my local agent about changing and he made the same sales pitch that I would have made about having a local agent who knows the area, personal relationships, etc.
So, I have not changed my coverage because I do feel like an personal hometown agent can be a very valuable benefit. Is it worth it to pay more for that service? If I am the agent, then YES!
So, how does everyone else feel about this? And if you don't mind being with a company that you have to call the 800# and talk with another representative, why don't you feel your clients shouldn't do the same thing??