- 10,711
The word on the street for a while now has been that EIAs are going to fall under jurisdiction of the SEC and become a registered product running through a B/D.
Currently premiums from fixed life products fall under the companies general account and the regulations/holding requirements surrounding it.
If this becomes a registered product I assume that will not be the case anymore??
Does anyone think that this would make EIAs a riskier product by that happening?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
When I say riskier, I dont necessarily mean just for the client. Can the company not leverage premiums from VAs more than fixed products? I was under the impression that they can. I could see them possibly getting underwater on investments related to EIAs if they become a registered product. And being able to leverage more money, could lead to higher caps or higher guarantees....
Is my reasoning flawed? Im no expert on the internal workings of Insurance company holdings....
Currently premiums from fixed life products fall under the companies general account and the regulations/holding requirements surrounding it.
If this becomes a registered product I assume that will not be the case anymore??
Does anyone think that this would make EIAs a riskier product by that happening?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
When I say riskier, I dont necessarily mean just for the client. Can the company not leverage premiums from VAs more than fixed products? I was under the impression that they can. I could see them possibly getting underwater on investments related to EIAs if they become a registered product. And being able to leverage more money, could lead to higher caps or higher guarantees....
Is my reasoning flawed? Im no expert on the internal workings of Insurance company holdings....
Last edited: