- 398
Death Cab,
Lets try one final time, disregarding premium, just looking at policy features, what do you show clients are the advantages? I don't know how to make it clearer.
There isn't anything materially different regarding the features and riders of the two policies. The difference is the strength of the companies, potential rate increases, and their ability to pay claims. I hope this clarifies things.
And I just took a quick look at the Comdex Ratings for MM, JH, Met, and Genworth. Mass is 99, JH and Met are 96. Genworth is 79. That is a huge difference in strength. And if there is anything we should have learned about insurance companies over the last few years, it's that strength matters.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
deathcab,
don't you realize that by selling them the more expensive policy now that you are selling them a premium increase from day one?
why is a premium increase now OK.
but a possible premium increase 20 years from now is bad.
plus, you're in florida. don't you know the fl state laws regarding rate increases were changed for policies issued after 4/1/2003?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
whatever happened to doing the best thing for your clients?
the implication of your statement is that you are not personally convinced that the mutual policy is the best choice.
I am not a LTCi candidate, but if I were, I would buy a mutual LTCi policy over a stock policy 100 times out of 100. I am quick to point out to my clients that my life and disability insurance are through a mutual company, even though they have higher premiums than comparable policies from stock companies. I practice what I preach. However, ultimately it is their decision. If they choose to buy the policy from the stock company, that's their decision. I gave up fighting clients a long time ago, and practice with the mantra "Give them a bit of what they want and a bit of what they need."
Last edited: