HUGE? NAIC Task Force Votes in Favor of Brokers

Yagents

Guru
5000 Post Club
12,665
Arizona
Not done yet, but this endorsement will help pass the bill. Anyone think that this could backfire (pulling commissions out of the MLR?)


TD Ameritrade

State Insurance Regulators Vote to Pad Broker Income and Insurer Profits at the Cost of Billions in Higher Health Insurance Premiums and Lost Rebates for Consumers
Last update: 6/30/2011 3:30:00 PM
WASHINGTON, June 30, 2011 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- NAIC Task Force Endorses Plan to Gut Minimum Standards for Health Care Spending in Health Reform Law
With no public discussion and on a voice vote, a subgroup of state insurance regulators with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) voted to endorse legislation that would cost consumers billions in higher health insurance premiums and lost rebates under the federal health reform law. Consumer Watchdog condemned the move to gut a central consumer protection of the Affordable Care Act and called on the full NAIC to reject the plan.
The legislation, written by lobbyists for insurance brokers, would preserve broker sales commissions and benefit the bottom line of insurance companies at the expense of consumers. The bill, proposed in Congress as HR 1206 (Rogers), would change the federal health reform law to allow insurance companies to exclude broker commissions from their administrative costs when calculating how much they spend on actual health care.
...........
Today's vote was taken by the NAIC's Professional Health Insurance Advisors Task Force, and was a recommendation to the NAIC's executive director that the NAIC endorse HR 1206. However, a decision with such dramatic negative consequences for consumers should not be decided by a minority of regulators, and should be considered and voted on by the full membership of the NAIC, said Consumer Watchdog.
The Chair of the Task Force, Florida Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty called for a voice vote which meant no individual commissioner's vote was recorded. However, West Virginia Commissioner Cline voted no, and North Carolina Commissioner Goodwin abstained. Other regulators present for the vote included representatives from: Alaska, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin. No public comment was allowed on the call.
 
(NAIC) voted to endorse legislation that would cost consumers billions in higher health insurance premiums and lost rebates under the federal health reform law.


whoooohoooo....we just got a raise.........
 
Peter robbed Paul, and.............Paul took it right back! Is this considered re- re -distribution.
 
I wonder if the person who wrote this article has an agenda....hmmmm.

I agree, heavily biased tone. "Pad" broker income in the title, how about "restoring" stolen income. After reading this, some consumers may die from this vote.
 
I cannot understand why the agent/broker keeps getting pounded. Where is the PR to tell the real story with impact so reporters and the public get to know how important the agent/broker is to the whole picture? Do the insurance carriers want the a/b? If so, why don't they throw a life saver into the distorted picture? If they don't want us then let them say so and put the whole thing to rest.
 
Had a lady call today. After way too much dialogue she wanted to know how much extra to use me vs calling the HO direct.

No difference of course. Same plans. Same rates. But here is the difference.

Every time you call home office a machine answers.

Press 1 for English.

Then if you are lucky you eventually talk to a human. Of course every time you call you will get a different one who may or may not know the answer but you have no idea if they are giving you the right information or not.

Or, you can call my number and speak to the same person every time.

Which plan works for you?
 
Had a lady call today. After way too much dialogue she wanted to know how much extra to use me vs calling the HO direct.

No difference of course. Same plans. Same rates. But here is the difference.

Every time you call home office a machine answers.

Press 1 for English.

Then if you are lucky you eventually talk to a human. Of course every time you call you will get a different one who may or may not know the answer but you have no idea if they are giving you the right information or not.

Or, you can call my number and speak to the same person every time.

Which plan works for you?

Can I assume she called the HO to verify this, and bought her plan through them? :D
 
Too early to tell, but doubt it. When we were talking she kept complaining about how unfriendly Golden Rule was. Said she felt like they were trying to get rid of her every time she called.

Of course I may feel the same if she becomes a client . . .
 
Back
Top