- 11,457
The company... doesn't matter. The knowledge of how the product works and where it can fit is more important.
Let's assume that you want to secure $5,000 per month of joint lifetime income for a retired couple. Which solution is best? SPIA or FIA?
- Joint lifetime SPIA for $250,000 with life-only payout (I'm making up numbers here).
Pro: Lowest principal required for cash flow generated.
Con: Upon the death of the 2nd spouse, there is no residual value for beneficiaries.
It may be the most efficient, but does it satisfy all their needs?
- Joint lifetime FIA for $500,000 with joint lifetime income rider.
Pro: Remaining values of the annuity can earn indexed interest credits that would primarily benefit beneficiaries.
Con: Requires a lot more money to secure the same level of income.
Which would the client choose? Whichever is most comfortable for them. Perhaps a mix of both to "lower" their purchase price for lifetime income.
It's easier to study annuities based on what problem they are designed to solve, rather than on the merits of the products themselves.
Let's assume that you want to secure $5,000 per month of joint lifetime income for a retired couple. Which solution is best? SPIA or FIA?
- Joint lifetime SPIA for $250,000 with life-only payout (I'm making up numbers here).
Pro: Lowest principal required for cash flow generated.
Con: Upon the death of the 2nd spouse, there is no residual value for beneficiaries.
It may be the most efficient, but does it satisfy all their needs?
- Joint lifetime FIA for $500,000 with joint lifetime income rider.
Pro: Remaining values of the annuity can earn indexed interest credits that would primarily benefit beneficiaries.
Con: Requires a lot more money to secure the same level of income.
Which would the client choose? Whichever is most comfortable for them. Perhaps a mix of both to "lower" their purchase price for lifetime income.
It's easier to study annuities based on what problem they are designed to solve, rather than on the merits of the products themselves.