- 26,745
----------
----------
----------
Hi Newby. Do you have example of term not being right product vs. FE. I'm trying to learn. Thanks
Not Newby but I have an example. a long time client calls me today because his little ten year term plan is terming out. He is now 70 and a grip of ailments. I have suggested permanent coverage to him the last couple rewrites. We had to go GI last year for his wife. These are $25,000 policies for final expenses. He is going to _pay_ now.
----------
FE is nothing but a marketing term for low face simplified issue whole life.
I don't proceed at any home without finding out their why.
My belief is that are two needs for life insurance, temporary or permanent. If the need is temporary then I recommend term. If it's permanent then I recommend whole life.
I don't believe in UL's so I don't sell UL's. GUL or otherwise.
Whether I write SIWL or FUWL for the permanent need always depends on the situation and health. More importantly the health. It doesn't bother me in the least to pivot to FUWL.
But, since I run FE leads and they are targeted demographically to the FE market, the vast majority of people I meet with are going to be FE prospects.
Do I believe in the product? No, I care nothing about the product or what a company might call it. I care what the product does.
That Xs 2 Except the GUL of course.