phoenixlord
Expert
- 55
What illustration? I asked you how much was lost due to 1035 and you vaguely answered that it was out of surrender period. So, I assumed it was 10 or 15 year old policy. If it's true then it will have some valuable benefits like reduced wtf fees and bonus crediting etc. I just don't understand the rationale of replacing such a policy.I actually increased his DB so he can also get policies and put more money towards the kids future. You're making it seem like I did a horrendous job, you've been attacking me since your original post.
Again, I WASN'T THE ORIGINAL AGENT ON THE POLICY. He was doing $210 a month with a minimum of $190, and only saved $4,500 in all those years. He saved almost the same amount doing a 1035 with me. His 2 kids have $1,200 each. And I met with him 3 times, so no, it wasn't a 1 hour appointment either. I tried doing what was best, I know that every person will have a different opinion of what should've been done.
And I'm waiting on your illustration.
My position is simple. All IULs are bad and you are taking a bad product after it has become somewhat good after 15 years and again putting him in a bad product. Look, I don't know why the big boys are choosing to stay out of this thread. Maybe, because they can't say anything to defend IULs now. They can help you out further. I don't want to mess up your confidence in selling. After all, you got to eat too. But please be careful with these IULs. They are a dangerous product and people lose money just like that whenever you touch, replace, increase, decrease etc. Have a good week end. Ta ta! Cheerio!