Here I fixed it for you.
they won't return the opportunity cost.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here I fixed it for you.
some agents want what's best for the consumer.
they won't return the opportunity cost.
So, I assume in your sales the opportunity cost is returned somehow magically.they won't return the opportunity cost.
Do you return opportunity cost for your clients
So, I assume in your sales the opportunity cost is returned somehow magically.
Some could make the case that a hybrid does return the opportunity cost when it pays out a death benefit for someone that didn't use the LTC benefits. But the reverse is not true for someone who has a ltci policy and gets nothing and loses their entire opportunity cost of what they could have invested those premiums in
again, I believe ltci is the best purchase a person can make. I'm just pointing out that you're points are not always 100% valid
Bullshit.
In your world, a traditional ltc actuary is pricing insurance for the consumer’s benefit and the linked benefit LTC actuary is ripping the consumer off.
The benefits of both insurance policies are priced accordingly based upon the benefits derived by the consumer.
Why not just state you have an inherent bias towards traditional LTC policies?
your arguments are getting worse.
Profit levels directly relate to comp.The profit levels in hybrids are HUGE compared to traditional LTCi.
If you don't see that you're delusional.
state of residence?
health?
net worth?
annual income?
Back to the original question:
Her state of residence is SC
Her health (now) is good. She is on disability because she had surgery (over five years ago) for chiari malformation.
Her net worth is $350,000
Her annual income is $18,900.
Profit levels directly relate to comp.
Who makes more money?
100k at 8% vs 4k annually at 85% with 10%+ renewals....
Spoiler: the numbers are really close.