- 7,066
Once again, I need to disagree with you. It was 1992.
Rick
The plans were put together and approved in 1991 and became effective and companies had to start selling them in 1992!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once again, I need to disagree with you. It was 1992.
Rick
You may think that is "ballsey" but where is it written that a doctor has to do anything or should be forced to or dictated to about who they should treat and what insurance they should accept.
How about if I tell you that you have to represent x company even though you neither like that company or would choose to represent them. Does that make you an "egomaniac"? Do you really need a reason and have to justify to someone else what you do and how you run your business? I don't and I would raise hell if someone told me I had to.
I would say the same thing you are accusing doctors of saying, "kiss my ass", it is my business and I will run it as I see fit. Who are either you or me to tell a doctor, dentist, insurance agent etc how to run their business?
What about the doctors who won't even see Medicare patients? What do you think of them? Should they be forced to see seniors on Medicare? I think not.
You have said you are
Frank,
The POINT is they don't care! So lets call it like it is. Lets educate the people that the docs are doing what is best for THEM!
i had a couple who were on the AARP supp. They contacted me to join secure horizons because they couldn't afford the supplement. I told them I wanted to contact the doctor before they did anything. When I expalined to the billing person that they were hoping to stay with Dr. X, she said "oh well too bad".
THAT is what I have a problem with!!!!
You are right it is a free country.
Except you and I go to jail for forcing people to do what we want them to do.
Doctors however have people so scared they are going to lose their doctor that they will pay $200 a month to do so 3 times a year.
Sorry you don't see how sick that is. i do!
The way it was presented to me was that it was designed for dual eligibles. While no one ever used the term "SNP", it was implied that it was a plan for Medi-Medi. The reality is that it never was and from what I understand (correct me if I'm wrong) that is why CMS stopped the sale of Duet.
I was told by the regional sales rep that WellCare paid 100% of the Medicare allowable. Turns out they pay 80% just like Medicare. When I found this out, I decided there was no advantage to California residents to go into the plan.
As far as concern for the doctor, if the doctor does not want to accept the plan, that is a concern. This has been the issue with PFFS all along, not just WellCare's plans.
In California, Medi-Medi people have terrific benefits including vision and dental. I know this is not the case in all states. I know that the dual SNP plans are a good value in Ohio but they are HMO plans.
In California, there is little reason for a full dual to be on any kind of managed care plan. The negative of not knowing if your doctor will take the plan makes putting a dual on a PFFS a little "iffy."
Rick
I would like to see what posts look like and what people's opinions are regarding HMO's and PFFS plans if the amount of commission was regulated to say $15.00 per month instead of the $400, $500, $600 dollars they are now receiving when they write one.
I venture to say that agents would not nearly be so "in love" with them and defending them the way they do.
They would then be wanting to "help people" get into a Med Supp.
My guess is the same agents who are going to disagree with that would be the first ones to jump back on the Med Supp band wagon.
Question for jdeasy:
If PFFS plans cost $20 less than a med supp, which would you sell.
In other words, if you take price out of the equation, which plan has better benefits and access to physicians?
If I offered to pay for either an MA or a Med Supp for your mother, which would you have me pay for?
Rick
How many posts have you read here where agents say things like "I wouldn't sell for that company, they only pay 10% commission" or similar statements like that. The company may have a good plan but to most agents that really doesn't matter does it? You may not be one of them but they are everywhere.
What if a prospect wants to take a policy from a certain company only and you don't sell for that company? Are you going to get licensed with them just to sell one policy even though you have decided in the past that you don't want to represent them?
Where do you see that doctors are "forcing people" to do what they want? And, when you say "you and I go to jail" please leave me out of that. Maybe you have tried to "force people to do what you want them to do" but that is not how I operate nor do I have to do that to sell insurance. (I stopped carrying a sawed-off shotgun with me on appointments several years ago.)
In other words, I don't understand your statement that people are being "forced" to do anything. If you mean that they are afraid then that is really their problem isn't it, not the doctors, yours or mine. You may be afraid of your doctor but I sure am not of mine. Neither are the vast majority of my senior clients either. Maybe you just deal with a wimpier client than I do, or not.
If you own a home you must have fire insurance. How many times has your house burned to the ground? Do you still pay the premium every year?
Some people want excellent medical coverage in the event they need it. Every agent who sells HMO's, PFFS plans uses that same argument. They all claim that all seniors are "poor" and can't afford a supplement. Maybe those are your clients but they are not mine.
I don't sell PFFS plans and even if I could I would not sell HMO's. My clients are happy with their Med Supps and do not want to change, especially with I throughly explain to them exactly what they are getting into if they do take a PFFS plan.
There is nothing "sick" about running your business they way you see fit regardless if insurance agents disagree with it.