- 1,305
No worries, I in haste may have just misread it. I was only trying to clarify was all.
Just here to help when I can.
Just here to help when I can.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To further you need a sponsor from a Broker Dealer. A series 7 isn't required to obtain sponsorship for a 6 and 63.
Due to the fact that I just went through the process myself, you should consider going straight to the 7 vs. the 6. A Lot of overlapping material covered to get the 6 just to do it all over again to get the 7.
Yep, might as well get the 7 since you will already be studying.
When I first got securities licensed in 1998, the guy who was "encouraging" me to get it done advised on just getting the 6/63 and 65. Said I didn't need the 7. Wish I would have had someone else to run that by. In the grand scheme of things I don't believe it hurt me any, but I would have preferred to have the 7 from the get go.
And here I stand today considering dropping the securities license and maybe just keeping the 65 and being done with the broker dealer. I just have a decent trail business that I hate to walk away from. And I have a really good BD. They aren't hard to work with. Although they have recently started requiring that they first review any index annuity sale resulting from the liquidation of securities. They don't take any of the commission, but I have to send them the paperwork to review and approve prior to me submitting it to the insurance company. I don't do a ton of index annuity business, but I hate to think they would reject a sale and then I have to go back and tell my client that they won't allow it. I'm sure the client wouldn't be too thrilled about that.
Can you not just convert them over to institutional shares inside a wrap account? At least the ones that are far enough along that they are well in the money from a load standpoint.... so you run hybrid for 4-5 years until you get everyone converted over to wrap accounts and institutional shares. Im not super experienced on the BD side of things so Im not sure how guys are dealing with that changeover. But that seems to be the logical thing to do. Lots of RIAs have consultants on staff to help guys like you with the process to RIA only. Reach out to a few and talk to them.
I have some in wrap accounts already, but I also have a decent amount in VA's (in the past I have used VA's to provide the income guarantee those clients wanted). Those are the ones I'd lose.
Ah. Yeah VAs with income riders could be a sticking point. Would the numbers work to move a good many of them over to Jefferson National? Id think account values would be in line with GLWB values these days, or at least close to it. I know it all depends on the individual policy though.. and the ones that are taking income already would likely be lost. Tough situation to be in. If it gets too bad maybe just find a new BD with a looser leash... lol.
Ah. Yeah VAs with income riders could be a sticking point. Would the numbers work to move a good many of them over to Jefferson National? Id think account values would be in line with GLWB values these days, or at least close to it. I know it all depends on the individual policy though.. and the ones that are taking income already would likely be lost. Tough situation to be in. If it gets too bad maybe just find a new BD with a looser leash... lol.