- Thread starter
- #141
- 2,152
Okay, so let us play a game here. Say he decided to take that $4,400 and move it over to his company 401 account, there is no matching and I'm finding this to be common. Now let us use 8% for the life of the fund including retirement years. Yet he has to go out and buy term, let us use 500 grand since Term's DB does not grow. The cost for him will be about $1,100 annually, so he now has only $3,300 to invest. At 8%, which is better then his current growth, plus we are giving him this till 85. So at retirement age 70 he can start withdrawing 8% for life and the principle should be level if the "risk" doesn't hurt him to bad, basically any down years during the 45 years that may lead to a lower then expected average growth is a real killer of this strategy.
So he has at age 70 the whopping amount of $436,948.13. So this retirement account will net him $34,955.00 annually (minus taxes, 15% or 20%) and when he dies he can pass the $436,948.13 to his spouse or children or whatever. Remember his term ran out at age 70, he has no insurance.
Now how does my strategy rank with this? Good question, and I'm planning on doing just.
So he has at age 70 the whopping amount of $436,948.13. So this retirement account will net him $34,955.00 annually (minus taxes, 15% or 20%) and when he dies he can pass the $436,948.13 to his spouse or children or whatever. Remember his term ran out at age 70, he has no insurance.
Now how does my strategy rank with this? Good question, and I'm planning on doing just.