- 26,145
I do not disagree with you. It is the blanket statements that X policy type is bad. I had the same opinion of FE till I came to this forum. I was wrong. Newby explained it best once when he mentioned that Pre Need agents had a low opinion of FE agents. It was not the policy type but the "agents" I had come in behind. Same for some traditional "agents" You really see it in Annuities. So now Annuities get a bad rap.
My Ex wife and her husband have great ONL ULs that they have had about 10 years. Their agent is brilliant and reviews them every other year with them. He is also very handsome and witty.
There is a ton of old UL out there that needs replacing. I wrote some of it back in the day. There is also a lot that is so much better than anything you could put them into today. I write some of it. But that takes an Insurance Agent and case design.
Let's use your ex wife as an example. What did you recommend to replace that UL?
I do not personally know an agent better at replacing policies than I. But I have to know that I am putting them in a better place or I become "that guy"
I am big on death benefit per per premium dollar, guarantees and short paying a policy. Sometime FE is better, sometimes it is UL. Sometimes it reduce the UL face amount and stop paying on it. No two 60 year olds are the same.
BTW, I also use your wording when explaining some ULs. Get their attention.
Lee
My Ex wife and her husband have great ONL ULs that they have had about 10 years. Their agent is brilliant and reviews them every other year with them. He is also very handsome and witty.
There is a ton of old UL out there that needs replacing. I wrote some of it back in the day. There is also a lot that is so much better than anything you could put them into today. I write some of it. But that takes an Insurance Agent and case design.
Let's use your ex wife as an example. What did you recommend to replace that UL?
I do not personally know an agent better at replacing policies than I. But I have to know that I am putting them in a better place or I become "that guy"
I am big on death benefit per per premium dollar, guarantees and short paying a policy. Sometime FE is better, sometimes it is UL. Sometimes it reduce the UL face amount and stop paying on it. No two 60 year olds are the same.
BTW, I also use your wording when explaining some ULs. Get their attention.
Lee
My suggestion is a true story, i was looking at my ex-wifes permanent policy (that was her discription) she was not getting it. "But the agent said it was permanent". she was lead to believe it was whole life. Only when i said, well if you die before you are 74, the kids get 100,000, but if you die after 74, the kids get nothing. Yes that woke her up! Her opinion of insurance agents is now even lower, something like gum stuck on the bottom of her shoe! or was that dog poo on the bottom of her shoe. They're a lot of them out they're sold by misleading agents. Who are now long gone. Grapped a few dollars of commission, screwing the client. Yes i suppose a well funded UL is ok, but most are not, and are ready to blow up. On hers she has paid 85 a month for 15 yrs, 4%, interest, has 10k of cash value, but now the insurance cost is going to 115, meaning they will take 30 difference out of the cash pot, until it is gone, 30 a month, then 45, then 65, until the cash value is 0. It is an A.R.T. meaning the insurance cost goes up every year! What is the cost of an A.R.T for a 85 yr old woman, 90 yr old woman. Get my point.
Last edited: