- Thread starter
- #51
phoenixlord
Expert
- 55
More bull cr*pWhen talking about the markets and averages you are discounting the market risk and inflation risk that you are exposed to with direct participation.
I would rather be capped with a credit guarantee from an institution that is heavily regulated with proven reserves than fully exposed in a taxable or even tax deferred account. But that is me. The IUL is a tool that can be used in the right circumstances to deliver better risk adjusted protection than simply leveraging assets elsewhere.
Right design, right circumstance, right client You can substitute "Right" with "Non-existent".
IULs don't work unless caps are high. If caps fall to single digits, IULs will implode even when funded "right" period. Index credits must exceed ever increasing expenses every year. Otherwise, they will be paid from the cash value. This is the same rat race majority Americans are in. They don't need another rat race. Now, are you going to say this is not for average Americans? Then you admit it's very risky.
Heavily regulated? The current look back period enforced by DOI is 30 days and IULs don't even credit anything until 1 year. By the time the client realizes that average returns shown on their illustration are bull crap and finds they can't get out because of surrender fee, hell will break loose. When the "Right" number of clients find themselves in this situation and "Right" attorneys file class action suits, "Right" justice will be served. You better come to your "Right" mind.