- Thread starter
- #11
- 477
somarco said:Over the last several years I have known a handful of people who have lost children. One woman took a leave from work and has not returned yet. Her daughter died almost 4 years ago in a car accident and the mom has had severe emotional issues since.
Another friend was seriously injured ($1M+) in a car accident that took the life of her son. She is still recovering (physically & emotionally) 3 years later. They took the life insurance proceeds and established a scholarship fund in his memory.
Her son graduated from high school just 2 months before the accident.
People who say you should not buy life insurance on a child because there is no lost income to replace have never known anyone who has lost a child. The child may not have generated income, but the parents who were raising the child were. How much of THEIR income should be replaced to allow them time off to mourn the loss of their child?
Another excellent reason. Most people never have to go through this awful experience (I talked about it with a prospect yesterday and it was awful even discussing it) fortunately and do not understand how it can impact them.
Insurance on children would be a WL sale in almost every instance, me thinks. You're probably looking at a relatively low amount say less than 100K and surely no more than 250K, so affordability shouldn't be a big issue. Plus, you can sell it as building a permanent asset for the children. If you're selling term, then you might as well make it $1M cause it's so cheap at that age (plus part of you wants to make the sale worthwhile). Then you sort of feel like you're promising serious bankroll on a tragedy.