chaos
Expert
Who would you reccomend for a guaranteed issue FE policy? I've seen alot on Presidential and a lot of companies that have a 3 year waiting period. ANy suggestions?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who would you reccomend for a guaranteed issue FE policy? I've seen alot on Presidential and a lot of companies that have a 3 year waiting period. ANy suggestions?
Presidential is not a true GI. The best rate out there is buying direct from MoO. it's a true GI and it's ROP +10% for two years.
Sometimes Vantis will beat the price of MoO by a dollar or two. I don't know if Vantis is a tru GI. It's ROP only for the first two years, {no + 10%}.
Vantis can be sold by independent agents. MoO cannot.
I don't know how you would get a contract with Vantis, but just mention it on here. I had a recruiter contact me last week about going with them for Vantis. I didn't keep the info, but I'm sure they are still lurking.
Yes, but you as the agent, know that you shouldn't do that. It could come back to bite you.
I am not advising it and would not do it. Had to turn down a prospect a couple for months ago for that reason. But the company is setting themselves up for it. If they don't want applications on those folks, they should put the question on the app. And, if they aren't going to accept them, they shouldn't be allowed to advertise Guarantee Issue. They shouldn't be allowed to have it both ways.
And UHL, if they are accepting those cases now, need to change the agent report on their app.
Presidential will not accept people that are in a nursing home, in a hospital or that have AIDS or HIV. It's not on the app, but the agent guide tells you they won't take them.
I don't know what would happen if an agent wrote them anyway. Probably go after the agent's E&O.
UHL is the same. They are a pretend GI.
Don't think it would be an E&O claim but I am sure they would terminate the agent in a heartbeat.. Not sure they could even do that for cause.
UHL sent out a memo a while back saying that theirs was a true GI but they haven't changed the agent report. If I am asked to write another, I am going to write UHL and then answer the agent report honestly with an explanation and see what happens.
But even if UHL is still going by the agent report, they could not refuse to pay a claim on one of those polices if an agent did write it. The question is not on the application and while the application is made a part of the policy and therefore can be used as grounds to contest, the agents report is not made an part of the policy and can't be used.
Thanks, I'll check them out.