Haha!!Which is worse? Going under the bus or being Newtered?
Scott cuts it off, Travis runs it over
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha!!Which is worse? Going under the bus or being Newtered?
Scott cuts it off, Travis runs it over
I know you guys are just churning the waters looking for forum drama. But you're going down the wrong path.
If an agent has a problem with a lead vendor or a lead vendor has a problem with an agent and they bring it to their IMO, yes the IMO should help them.
This issue was a about a level 2 on the drama scale in my opinion.
I'll give you the play by play:
1. Vendor calls me to let me know one of our agents has reversed charges on a credit card payment for leads that he had filled. I get his side of the story which sounded legit. (Had initial issues filling the order but got it done.) I asked the vendor my main qualifying question: So if the agent pays you for the leads he got, is that all there is? Are you happy and is this done? Answer was a definite yes. That's all he wants.
2. I call the agent to get his story. Leads came in slow. Didn't return phone calls until he contested the charges. Then he got his leads but not sure if he got them all, he lost count. So I ask my Judge Judy question to the agent: If you take an inventory and the vendor has gotten you all the leads you paid for, will you pay him and be happy? Well...I don't know...It's kinda the principle...maybe. (He's not a crooked guy, his feelings were just hurt.)
Now the day right before this happened the same agent came to me wanting me to work things out so he can order additional leads through this same vendor. So I know he didn't think the leads were bad or that he wouldn't get his leads.
The other part that you guys don't know is that is the third lead vendor that this agent has had issues with that we have had to get involved in to resolve. And We have over 1,000 contracted agents and I don't remember getting involved with a single other one.
Now when the vendor comes on the forum and does a drunken rant like he did the other night, that is WAY out of line. And that's a completely different issue. That's just a drunk guy playing to the forum regulars for entertainment.
All I know is all the agents that that buy leads from that vendor feel they are pretty good and even the agent in question wanted to buy more.
And the agent is a good agent over all but is pretty much a problem child for any lead vendor. ( As in I like the city, no I like the country, no I like tele-leads, no I like mail leads, change this word, I told you to not mail this apartment building, etc.) I've never had an agent that bounces around so much.
But as far as I can tell, agent got his leads, vendor got paid and the only drama is what you make of it.
But if you are with an IMO that ignores problems, you are with the wrong IMO.
Not trying to get things off track again, but I just walked out with $94 a month premium on the three kids. Dad as the payor of course.
Who did you write? Settlers, SLAC, MOO??
Oh yeah. 20 Pay Settlers.
And the lead?