3 Juvenile Deliquents

[Guest]

Under the bus? I'm simply saying what is expected ethically. If you sell leads you should deliver them, if you receive leads you should pay for them. I don't know where the blame falls in their disagreement. That is beyond the scope of my responsibility and information that I have. We are not a gang, what is right is right.

in your post #104, you make no mention of any wrong doing Thad may have had in this, just your agent.. so yes, under the bus

 

[WinoBlues]

Under the bus? I'm simply saying what is expected ethically. If you sell leads you should deliver them, if you receive leads you should pay for them. I don't know where the blame falls in their disagreement. That is beyond the scope of my responsibility and information that I have. We are not a gang, what is right is right.

That.


...................

 

[jdeasy]

Agreed if they freely release. However, people are people and they can change their mind or justify anything.

Let's say that in this case Josh's imo, sounding like Fex, decided to make it hard on Josh. They could. I assume Fex would not, but they could. I personally would not have only one or two insurance companies either.

I sure as hell would not do business with a vendor, IMO, or company that even hinted at trying to control who I did business with. They work for me not the other way around.

If Scott or Travis, {and they are the only ones that have a say in the operation of FEX}, has ever told any agent what lead vendor to use or not use it's news to me.

You may very well have info that I don't have? But I think I would have heard about it if it did happen.

On this particular instance I have heard 4 stories. And all are different. That's why I've stayed out of it.

 

[senior-advisor-indiana]

If Scott or Travis, {and they are the only ones that have a say in the operation of FEX}, has ever told any agent what lead vendor to use or not use it's news to me.

You may very well have info that I don't have? But I think I would have heard about it if it did happen.

On this particular instance I have heard 4 stories. And all are different. That's why I've stayed out of it.

I think you owe it to all of us to enter another version into this thread...

 

[jdeasy]

I think you owe it to all of us to enter another version into this thread...

No need for another version. I do have an opinion as to which version I believe but I will keep that one to myself too.

 

[senior-advisor-indiana]

No need for another version. I do have an opinion as to which version I believe but I will keep that one to myself too.

I agree with that version also...

 

[WinoBlues]

If Scott or Travis, {and they are the only ones that have a say in the operation of FEX}, has ever told any agent what lead vendor to use or not use it's news to me.

You may very well have info that I don't have? But I think I would have heard about it if it did happen.

On this particular instance I have heard 4 stories. And all are different. That's why I've stayed out of it.

Not sure if you are relying to the wrong person. I do not believe I said anything ababout Fex telling anyone to use any vendors.

You definitely get more of the gossip than I do. I am not on any of the pipelines or even the calls.

Four different stories from four different involved people? The vendor brought it here to put the agent on blast, right? So we, agents, all should stay out of it?

Again, not sure if you meant to reply to me.

 

[jdeasy]

Not sure if you are relying to the wrong person. I do not believe I said anything ababout Fex telling anyone to use any vendors.

You definitely get more of the gossip than I do. I am not on any of the pipelines or even the calls.

Four different stories from four different involved people? The vendor brought it here to put the agent on blast, right? So we, agents, all should stay out of it?

Again, not sure if you meant to reply to me.

I didn't say anything about anyone else staying out of it. I said I have. But it should not have been brought here in my opinion.

 

[senior-advisor-indiana]

I didn't say anything about anyone else staying out of it. I said I have. But it should not have been brought here in my opinion.

I agree it shouldn't have been brought here but since it was, I believe we as forum members, have a duty to blow it out of proportion...

I am actually surprised that Josh didn't blast Thad on the forum for not returning emails...

 

[WinoBlues]

I didn't say anything about anyone else staying out of it. I said I have. But it should not have been brought here in my opinion.

We agree :shock:

Personal stuff should not be posted here. When a Vendor or IMO does it it is unprofessional in my book. Probably a double standard on my part.

----------

I agree it shouldn't have been brought here but since it was, I believe we as forum members, have a duty to blow it out of proportion...

I am actually surprised that Josh didn't blast Thad on the forum for not returning emails...

Hahaha hahahaha