- 9,744
Ok, thanks. How is that different than an independent agent...I know, I know...I'm a newb
If an insurance carrier doesn't want to mess around with recruiting agents, dealing with their BS, training etc., they may use an IMO/FMO. Higher cost to them - they have to pay higher compensation so the FMO/IMO can get their piece as a distribution partner. They may offer "advanced commissions" as well.
On the other hand, some insurance carriers/companies will contract agents directly - and handle the crap work in-house. No override to an IMO/FMO.
An "independent agent" could contract through either.
I think you'll find almost universally that veteran agents such as myself prefer direct contracts with the carrier. An IMO/FMO really can't offer us much we don't already have...