- Thread starter
- #31
helgaemines
Super Genius
- 209
In most cases, people need to be wooed. Most of the leads that come in via the internet (especially for term) are people window shopping and not ready to pull the trigger. I notice the same with auto (which is why it will be a cold day in hell before I buy any of those again), but I'll try to keep the convo to the scope of life insurance.
This is largely due to quoting engines on these websites requiring people to provide contact info to see rates. Easily solved if these quote engine developers made it easy for anyone to see rates without contact info being provided. Then, if they are interested, a request for contact is submitted. This way agents don't waste time and money on bunk leads and only talk to people who are further down the buyer journey. Inbound marketing is 100% more effective than this hybrid theory currently in play.
But where is the money in that?
Even then, some people still need handholding and rapport to commit.
That's what I've thought... People ask for information without any commitment; just to know how much term life insurance would cost m according to specifications provided (age, gender, smoker).
Last night I was thinking about everything you have written to me and I think a better idea would be "inbound marketing" to create my leads.
But then it would take me longer to create a hot lead.
Otherwise, if I bought "aged leads"; I would treat these as "cold leads" and send them emails and newsletters – this in order to nurture them.
What do you think?