- 15,041
Well it doesn't show with all the negative comments regarding the feasibility of the alternative FIA strategy.
I understand that many people who do not hold themselves to a fiduciary standard would rather put a client in a crappy bonus fia that pays a high commission, and I wish they would just say that rather than trying to poke holes in strategies that work if you have the financial know-how.
All the lawsuits against FIA carriers is due to unethical, close-minded agents who prey on individual who fall for their sales tactics. If everyone treated their "clients" like their mother the industry would not have such a bad rap PERIOD
You know, it is possible for a product to serve everyone's interest. There are plenty of FIAs that do that when suitably sold. But when all your knowledge of FIAs comes from your B/D, mutual fund reps, and VA wholesalers, it is easy to have a bad opinion of them.
There are plenty of RRs, RIAs, etc putting people in inappropriate securities in the name of "suitability". Putting someone in a bad FIA is no different than putting an investor into an investment that is too risky for their tolerance. Yet we treat the insurance agent like a criminal and praise the RR.
Every time I see some RR say every 30 or 40 year old needs to be in mutual funds, I just cringe. One of two things is going to happen, that RR is going to be named in a complaint when the 30 year old takes a bath because the fund was too risky for them, or by pushing funds that are too aggressive, they are going to chase the 30 or 40 year old away from doing any retirement savings.