Wow! Someone needs to take this to court. Won't stand up to scrutiny, if it actually works that way. They claim they own the lead because you qouted on their system, but then they also require you quote on their system. And then they ban you for 3 years? But you buy the lead?
They can contractually keep you from talking smack and I understand that, but I don't see how this type of non-compete can stand up to any legal scrutiny. On top of that, 38% bonus, if the OP can't write a policy, doesn't help much.
I might have to find a copy of the current contracts to review. I haven't seen them in years and I know they have changed significantly, but this is over the top.
Dan
I have no doubt that they will be challenged by someone eventually in court.