California Property Insurance Collusion

marindependent

Guru
1000 Post Club
Are Insurers in California illegally Colluding?

ABC News Reports here.

The Consumer Watchdog Letter states:
"Consumer Watchdog Urges Attorney General Bonta to Investigate Industry Collusion on Homeowner Insurance Shortages"

"Sacramento, CA—Citing growing shortages of homeowners, renters, and condo insurance in California, which the industry is using to pressure Sacramento leaders into a last-minute bailout that would lead to skyrocketing insurance premiums, Consumer Watchdog this morning asked CA Attorney General Rob Bonta to initiate an immediate investigation into whether insurance companies are colluding with each other to force higher prices, in violation of California law.

“Insurance companies doing business in California are orchestrating shortages to pressure state officials to boost insurance premiums and authorize a massive bailout of the insurance industry that will likely cost Californians billions,” the letter to the Attorney General states. “Industry insiders have confirmed the companies’ deliberate, ongoing destabilization of the marketplace and have described to Consumer Watchdog how insurance companies and their lobbyists coordinate their actions to create shortages.”

“We have also learned from industry insiders how the insurance companies coordinate their activity,” the letter continues. “They convene weekly meetings at the offices of their lobbyists and lawyers – Personal Insurance Federation of California and American Property Casualty Insurance Association. These meetings are ostensibly for the purpose of discussing public policy issues. But Consumer Watchdog is informed that the conversations include the sharing of confidential corporate information about planned market withdrawals, proposed rate requests, and other activity not publicly available. Consumer Watchdog can produce a confidential witness with decades of experience in the industry who participated in these meetings to validate these claims.”

In its letter to Bonta, Consumer Watchdog detailed how a growing number of insurance companies – including State Farm, Allstate, and Farmers – have destabilized California’s $12 billion homeowner market by refusing to sell new homeowners policies to applicants or to renew existing policies. Auto insurance companies are taking similar actions, Consumer Watchdog said. Industry lobbyists are using the threat of further withdrawals to demand that state elected officials allow companies to charge excessive rates by undermining the anti-price gouging protections of Proposition 103 and by requiring all policyholders in the state to pay additional surcharges to reimburse insurance companies for unexpected wildfire losses in the FAIR Plan, the state’s “insurer of last resort.”

A lobbyist flying to Sacramento two weeks ago confirmed the industry’s Sacramento strategy, noting that State Farm and Allstate had withdrawn from selling homeowner insurance and boasting that “we are trying to jam a bill in the last three weeks of the year….” He joked it would be a “surprise.” The implication of his comments is that the companies staged the pullouts as a way of pressuring an eleventh-hour deal.

Insurance Companies Previously Caught Colluding to Create Shortages in California


This is not the first time insurance companies have conspired to create shortages in California, Consumer Watchdog told AG Bonta. Insurance companies conspired to stop doing business in California on the day after insurance reform Proposition 103 passed on November 8, 1988, according to Bonta’s predecessor, Attorney General John Van de Kamp. The purpose of the unlawful boycott was to pressure the California Supreme Court into overturning the initiative. “The success of their lawsuit [challenging Proposition 103] would be aided by a mass withdrawal, creating a crisis in which insurance would become unavailable,” Van de Kamp concluded, finding collusion after a two-year investigation.

Consumer Watchdog urged Bonta to act immediately to protect Californians’ pocketbooks and the integrity of the democratic process. The non-profit said Bonta should immediately issue subpoenas to insurance company lobbyists, executives, and state elected officials and regulators who have been working with the insurance industry to obtain the bailout. “These individuals will have the documents and knowledge that will confirm exactly what the insurance companies have been doing and why.”"
 
but I actually became a little dumber from reading it.
Why would I be offended about you being dumb?
If I got offended from others being dumb do you really think I would watch the Real House wifes of Orange County?

And FTR I did not share becuase I agreed with it - I shared so that others in other areas understand what the challenge is here.

and this statement here:"including State Farm, Allstate, and Farmers – have destabilized California’s $12 billion homeowner market by refusing to sell new homeowners policies to applicants or to renew existing policies." is such a poorly worded statement alleging 3 different insurers or doing one OR another thing. That is not unlike saying Bob, John, and Joe are gulity of Parking Meter Violoations or Murder. Renewing exisiting policies and selling new policies are totally different processes. And just to be clear - the market was unstable long before State Farm made their announcement months ago. All the indendent agents knew it years ago. But it wasnt until SF announcement that the media took note.
 
Last edited:
Just proof we would be better off as a society without insurance companies as a safety net.

Just give everyone their premiums back & everyone would be better off, right?

The irony of politicians accusing an industry of collusion. Our entire political system is based on collusion within the party during campaign, then collusion between the parties while in office along with collusion during office & post office with lobbyists
 
The problem with the word collussion is that it can a very very fine line. One type of Collusion is illegal and another is perfectly legal I do not disagree with you @Allen Trent - closer to the world of insurance: Have you ever heard of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners?

According the NAIC website: "We assist state insurance regulators, individually and collectively,...By ..... coordinating regulatory oversight, " There you have it in black and white.

Now I am not against what the NAIC does, far from it. But the insurance marketplace in recent years has not never been a totally open and free capitalist system.
 
Yep, that's what I do for a living, scam people. How else could I buy a Delorean?
big-brain-point-finger-at-forehead.gif
 
Back
Top