PrivClientSG
Guru
- 378
Inquiring minds want to know? Why do Medicare Supplement companies close a book of business and then come out with a new plan? Can someone explain the logic in it to me?
Accounting, finance, and financial reasons.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Inquiring minds want to know? Why do Medicare Supplement companies close a book of business and then come out with a new plan? Can someone explain the logic in it to me?
If a carrier needs to raise their rates, that is understandable. But to close a book in my mind is a total disregard. for their existing clients.Please no birthday rule.
Carriers responsible for covering risks should not be required to ignore risks.
Underwriting is not the enemy.
<Points to ACA -- asks the audience: "see that over there?">
Case closed.
It is a positive if all the agent cares about is increasing productionThe local Aetna agent manager actually described the closed BOB as a POSITIVE with a straight face. I felt like laughing in her face.
If a carrier needs to raise their rates, that is understandable. But to close a book in my mind is a total disregard. for their existing clients.
I don't think so. I always thought this was the case but I think if they delay Part B and have split dates they used up their trial right by staying on the employer plan.Trial right 1 is getting a mapd at age 65 and having 1 yr to switch to any med sup if your choosing .Trial right 2 is switching from a sup to mapd at any age then wanting to switch back within 1 yr . So if a person works till age 68 and gets their part b when they retire . I know they can't enroll in a mapd and within 12 months use trial right one to go to a sup because there A and B dates different . But let's say they bought a Sup at age 68 with different A and B dates . At age 75 they decide to try a mapd and don't like it . Under trial right 2 don't they have 12 months to return to their orginal sup ?
I don't think so. I always thought this was the case but I think if they delay Part B and have split dates they used up their trial right by staying on the employer plan.
Birthday rule seems to be working OK in the states that have it.Please no birthday rule.
Carriers responsible for covering risks should not be required to ignore risks.
Underwriting is not the enemy.
<Points to ACA -- asks the audience: "see that over there?">
Case closed.
Birthday rule seems to be working OK in the states that have it.
Please no birthday rule.
Carriers responsible for covering risks should not be required to ignore risks.
Underwriting is not the enemy.
<Points to ACA -- asks the audience: "see that over there?">
Case closed.
MAPD doesn't have to worry about rate increases and adverse selection as long as they can . . .
Require prior authorization
Use algorithms to postpone/deny claims
Manipulate networks
Increase copays
Eliminating underwriting leads to unaffordable premiums (ACA, Medigap) and reduced access to care (MAPD)
There is no such thing as a free lunch