JackRyan709
New Member
- 1
New to the forum here, so apologies in advance if I'm asking something that's often answered (I looked, I promise!). ;-)
I'm a 39 (nearly 40, ahh!) year old male who's never been in an at fault accident, never had any claims, and who hasn't had even as much as a speeding ticket in 10+ years. Lived in Nevada, just moved to Texas.
In short, the bulk of auto insurances quotes that I get from major companies are stupidly overpriced. $350 - 650 a month for a decent policy. I'm currently driving a new Subaru WRX, but I've been having this problem with the last several cars, including a car that had only what can be described as an excessively over priced (if not predatory priced) liability coverage for a 1984 Mercedes. Literally, I was paying $178+ a month for **liability** insurance on a 36 year old, $3500 car with 250,000 miles on it....that had a 0-60 time of about 5 years and pretty much a 0% chance of getting a speeding ticket.
The easy explanation was that there was a period of time that my credit score had taken a huge hit and I understand that's a determining factor. It shouldn't be. Having brief financial issues doesn't suddenly make someone a bad driver ("Oh, my FICO is a 570, geeze, let me run this stop sign!") -- nor should it be remotely more relevant of a risk factor than 20+ years of a clean driving record....nor should that even be legal to hit people when they're down, but it's at least an explanation.
The thing is, my credit has long since recovered. Wallet is full of Tier 1 credit cards. Decent interest rate on the car loan, on and on. The only thing that is still affected seems to be my car insurance rate.
Is there something that I'm missing? Something to look up to see why my risk factor is allegedly high, even though it shouldn't be?
I'm a 39 (nearly 40, ahh!) year old male who's never been in an at fault accident, never had any claims, and who hasn't had even as much as a speeding ticket in 10+ years. Lived in Nevada, just moved to Texas.
In short, the bulk of auto insurances quotes that I get from major companies are stupidly overpriced. $350 - 650 a month for a decent policy. I'm currently driving a new Subaru WRX, but I've been having this problem with the last several cars, including a car that had only what can be described as an excessively over priced (if not predatory priced) liability coverage for a 1984 Mercedes. Literally, I was paying $178+ a month for **liability** insurance on a 36 year old, $3500 car with 250,000 miles on it....that had a 0-60 time of about 5 years and pretty much a 0% chance of getting a speeding ticket.
The easy explanation was that there was a period of time that my credit score had taken a huge hit and I understand that's a determining factor. It shouldn't be. Having brief financial issues doesn't suddenly make someone a bad driver ("Oh, my FICO is a 570, geeze, let me run this stop sign!") -- nor should it be remotely more relevant of a risk factor than 20+ years of a clean driving record....nor should that even be legal to hit people when they're down, but it's at least an explanation.
The thing is, my credit has long since recovered. Wallet is full of Tier 1 credit cards. Decent interest rate on the car loan, on and on. The only thing that is still affected seems to be my car insurance rate.
Is there something that I'm missing? Something to look up to see why my risk factor is allegedly high, even though it shouldn't be?