Have a client who is being sued for a new home he is building that a customer signed a sales agreement on.
Due to continuing costs, the price for the final home has continued to increase.
Sales agreement included an "escalation clause" essentially allowing cost increases as costs rose.
Home was listed at 335k, then increased to 375k, then increased 435,500, then increased to 455k. Due to the issues at the site, the completion time has been hindered as well, by 6-9 months.
Primary motivator was increased environmental costs which pushed changes to the septic system but also overall inflationary problems with supplies that industry is seeing.
Buyer decided they had enough and is suing for breach of contract, fraud, good faith, detrimental reliance, negligence, etc.
I expected the carrier to issue a reservation of rights letter and defend the [outlandish] suit, but sounds like they are bordering on issuing a full denial saying "we don't have coverage for breach of contract, fraud, etc."
Ultimately, my take is the suit is being used as leverage against my client to sell the property at a reduced cost.
Trying to figure out the best path forward and wondering if any here have had any similar experiences and what the path you took was and any resulting outcome.
Due to continuing costs, the price for the final home has continued to increase.
Sales agreement included an "escalation clause" essentially allowing cost increases as costs rose.
Home was listed at 335k, then increased to 375k, then increased 435,500, then increased to 455k. Due to the issues at the site, the completion time has been hindered as well, by 6-9 months.
Primary motivator was increased environmental costs which pushed changes to the septic system but also overall inflationary problems with supplies that industry is seeing.
Buyer decided they had enough and is suing for breach of contract, fraud, good faith, detrimental reliance, negligence, etc.
I expected the carrier to issue a reservation of rights letter and defend the [outlandish] suit, but sounds like they are bordering on issuing a full denial saying "we don't have coverage for breach of contract, fraud, etc."
Ultimately, my take is the suit is being used as leverage against my client to sell the property at a reduced cost.
Trying to figure out the best path forward and wondering if any here have had any similar experiences and what the path you took was and any resulting outcome.