Fewer Americans Plan For LTC

Arthur, your post of 5:08PM yesterday has paragraphs, but could use a space between them. I had to reach for my eye drops after reading your erudite post.

Sorry,
I failed english composition in 6th grade. But, if you could read my post and somewhat agreed with what I said, then I've accomplished my goal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Al, you raise some good points and I'll try to address each one.
"Besides those who are not insurable and those who simply can't afford it, who else it is not appropriate for?"
Other than those 2 groups, LTCi is right for everyone else, except for a 3rd group and those are people who are in denial. "It will never happen to me". Of course statistics can very easily prove that group wrong.
"I suppose the wealthy single or couple with three to five million in cash assets is not a prospect... but even then... cash assets have a way of losing value. Ask anyone who had a large stock portfolio... which is probably a smaller one now".
People who have in excess of 3, 4, or 5 million dollars didn't get that way by being stupid. The concept of any insurance is to purchase protection for pennies on the dollars.

A wealthy individual or couple can protect millions of dollars down the road by spending a few thousand dollars a year. Why wouldn't they want to do that? Many folks can comfortably afford to replace their house if there was a fire, yet they buy homeowner's insurance.

I have many policyholders who have a substantial net worth but would rather buy a policy than put hundreds of thousands of their own dollars at risk.

One major problem with the product is that people don't like paying money for something they don't think they will use.
Al, I have never met someone who told me that they lay awake each night worried because for 25 years they have been paying homeoner's insurance and never had a fire. If a fire (or LTC event) took place the policy will be there for you. Isn't that what insurance is all about?

People BELIEVE that they will get sick, or wreck the car, or have a tree fall on the house, but damn few believe they will need LTC.
That goes back to my earlier response about "Denial" which is the reason that most people do not purchase a policy. But, when your next door neighbor @ 65 has a stroke and has to spend the rest of his life in a wheelchair and his wife has to sell the home so she can afford to provide care for her husband, then "Denial" takes on a very different look.

What is needed is an LTC product where the client does not lose control of ALL the assets she pays in, perhaps similar to a WL or a VA or a fixed (indexed) annuity.
How about a Return of Premium Rider? Pay for 30 years, never use the policy, die and your beneficiaries will get 100% of the premium back. Does that solve the problem? Or how about a life/ltc hybrid product? If LTC services are needed the money is available from your life insurance policy (accelerated death benefit) if not, then you have a tax-free death benefit available for your family.

And what is also needed is some guarantee that the $300 a day policy you buy now will still pay $300 a day ten years from now without an increase in premium (or cut in term) five years from now.
Al, can you name me any insurance product on the planet (other than life) that can guarantee premiums remain the same for the life of the policy? My health insurance goes up 10%-20% every single year. My homeowners premiums increases every year, so does my auto policy. Why should LTCi (which is Health insurance) be any different?

LTC is seen by many as a "gamble" where the deck is stacked totally in the house's favor.
Many people see all types of insurance that way. But for you, who is in the insurance business, I would expect you to be smarter than most uneducated consumers.

I don't sell LTC directly. I have a gal not far from me where that is all she does... nothing else. We have a deal where I pre-sell (qualify) my life or health client and she comes in and meets with them on all the specifics and we do a split, I help her "close" and it's done and done. It's "found money" to me... and an "easy" sale for her... the client gets the benefit of a "trusted advisor" (me) and an LTC "expert" (her)... win-win-win.
What's the win-win-win? You obviously don't believe in the product, you've made that very clear, BUT.......... if you can find a live-wire, you have no problem sending him/her to your friend so you can do a split.
Let's see...... the product is only worthwhile if you can make a buck on it? I would expect more than that from you.

That said, we only do about 4 cases a year. LTC is such a flawed product in its design (not concept) that most people just don't want it.
It's only flawed if you don't understand it, and it's obvious that you don't.

As another person noted, the LTC sector can't seem to get its act together and manufacture a product that people really WANT nor has the industry even tried to convince them that there is even a NEED. My hat is off to any agent who can make a full-time, sustainable living (say $75,000 FYC) in the LTC market.
As I mentioned earlier, LTCi is a relatively new product and it's going through growing pains. No one really knows where it's going to eventually wind up. If that prospect doesn't realize a need for the product then you're not dealing with a viable prospect. I don't sit in front of people who have no need for a LTC policy. Why would I do that? My best prospect is one who's mother, at 82 was just diagnosed with Alzheimer's and has to enter a nursing home. She is watching her parent's assets being depleted by $10,000 each and every month. That person, who may very well have been in denial for the past 20 years now has a wake-up call. They had no LTC plan, they never saw the need for one. But now, it's different. That's not a sale Al, that's a lay-up.

Do you have a LTC policy for yourself & your wife? Probably not but you should. At 64, (not sure how old Mrs. Al is) it's something that you should consider. Right now, you're self-insured. If you had a stroke tomorrow, where would the money come from to pay for your care? Are you willing to tap into your pensions, your stocks, your savings? What would happen to your income? Your social security, your interest & dividends, your IRA distribution?
How would your wife maintain her standard of living if $100,000/year of family income went for the cost of your care?

I'm not trying to sell you a policy Al, I just want you to understand that there is a very valid reason for the product's existenece. Again, is it right for everyone? No! But it's right for more folks than you're willing to admit.
 
Last edited:
What's the win-win-win? You obviously don't believe in the product, you've made that very clear, BUT.......... if you can find a live-wire, you have no problem sending him/her to your friend so you can do a split.

Let's see...... the product is only worthwhile if you can make a buck on it? I would expect more than that from you.

It's only flawed if you don't understand it, and it's obvious that you don't.

Typical personal attack from Arthur. Dare to challenge him and you are just "stupid."

There was no need for him to be snarky.

Reasonable men can disagree in a reasonable fashion.

I'm glad he has a passion for LTC. It's his offensive attitude I don't want to deal with here.

One day Arthur is going to understand the magic words, "I understand what you are saying and why you think that, but you should look at this from a different perspective in that...." instead of "You're an ***."

I should have learned not to engage with him from the last time.

I'm gone from this polemic. I don't want to deal with Arthur's agenda.

He will probably delete this, but I'll put a link to his posting in my next newsletter as an example for clients on what a pushy, high-pressure agent sounds like when selling a complex product that people are skeptical about.

This is a good example of how NOT to "sell" something. I was looking to be educated, not castigated.

My posting was perfectly rational and non-personal about Arthur. His response was insulting, and there was entirely no need for it. He is here to teach us about LTC, not insult our lack of knowledge about it. But that is so typical of this forum so often.

Maybe I just don't have a thick-enough "skin" to play the game in the LTC section with this moderator. I'm sure that is it.

-Al
 
I've got to agree with Arthur. You say you don't understand or believe in the product, but you are willing to refer it to someone else to get paid.
 
Typical personal attack from Arthur. Dare to challenge him and you are just "stupid."

There was no need for him to be snarky.

Reasonable men can disagree in a reasonable fashion.

I'm glad he has a passion for LTC. It's his offensive attitude I don't want to deal with here.

One day Arthur is going to understand the magic words, "I understand what you are saying and why you think that, but you should look at this from a different perspective in that...." instead of "You're an ***."

I should have learned not to engage with him from the last time.

I'm gone from this polemic. I don't want to deal with Arthur's agenda.

He will probably delete this, but I'll put a link to his posting in my next newsletter as an example for clients on what a pushy, high-pressure agent sounds like when selling a complex product that people are skeptical about.

This is a good example of how NOT to "sell" something. I was looking to be educated, not castigated.

My posting was perfectly rational and non-personal about Arthur. His response was insulting, and there was entirely no need for it. He is here to teach us about LTC, not insult our lack of knowledge about it. But that is so typical of this forum so often.

Maybe I just don't have a thick-enough "skin" to play the game in the LTC section with this moderator. I'm sure that is it.

-Al

Gee. a man refutes every false argument you can offer against LTCi and you burst out in tears and run home. :cry: . Read his post over and over and did not find the word "stupid" in it but I did see him appealing to you to quit being a hypocrite for jumping at the chance to earn a commission on a product in which you obviously have no confidence.
 
Maybe I just don't have a thick-enough "skin" to play the game in the LTC section with this moderator. I'm sure that
is it.

Yup.......I think that's it.

I fail to see where I insulted you, attacked you or called you stupid. What I tried to do was educate you on a product that you clearly do not understand.

This was not about "Al bashing" this was trying to get you to understand what LTCi is about and in what situation it's appropriate. I started my post by stating that you made some good points.

If you have the right to attack the product (and you do), then I certainly have the right to defend it.

The point is Al, I'm doing this for 16 years and I have come up against every type of situation from a prospect questioning the viability of the product and I have a legitimate response to every objection. I have come up against your questions & concerns hundreds of times in the past and from an uneducated consumer (uneducated about the product) yours are very typical.

If you would like to interview me for your newsletter, I'd be honored. Please contact my public relations department for my "interview rates" I'm sure we can come to an agreement.

You're wrong about another thing...... I am far from being a "Pushy salesperson". Pushy salespeople can not survive selling this product.

I have no desire to delete your post. In fact, your post proves that you have a lack of knowledge about a product and that makes you no different than the majority of the population, which is confirmed by the Hancock article that I posted to start this thread.

And, to Sam, Val and the other moderators, please leave this post intact.
Thanks........................
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I read about two types of LTCi policies that are guaranteed to never have a premium increase. Here's where I found that:

How much and when can long-term care insurance
premiums be increased? « LTCShop.com

Hope you didn't have to spend a whole lot of time searching for that link Scott.

Good article, if you bump in to the author, please thank him for sharing that.
 
Last edited:
a hypocrite for jumping at the chance to earn a commission on a product in which you obviously have no confidence.

What makes you think I don't have LTC? Did I say that? Why did you jump to that conclusion?

I don't like how the product is designed and I don't have confidence that it will be available if needed, nor do I believe anyone will be able to afford the premiums when older.

I don't like auto or home insurance either but I recognize the need for it... as well as LTC.

Arthur's response was not about LTC... it was all about Arthur marking his territory... saying in effect... don't cross the line with him.

Why he had to be so snarky I don't know. But there are so many like him here. It's one of the reasons a lot of agents who can afford it are joining the Agent Navigator site where the forums are highly moderated and snarky remarks are strictly prohibited.

If Arthur wants agents to have a dialogue about LTC, maybe it is not such a good idea for him to denigrate agents in his reply. We know he is an LTC expert. He doesn't have to prove it by being insulting to people in the venue.

If this is how he is going to be, perhaps the section would be better served by a more tolerant moderator.

It should be OK to disagree with the moderator and not be insulted. That's all I'm sayin'. I know most of you disagree. That's fine. I'm used to it.

YMMV.

Al
 
Al, I guess when you make comments about people only having a 10th grade education when they disagree with you isn't "snarky", huh?
 
Al, I guess when you make comments about people only having a 10th grade education when they disagree with you isn't "snarky", huh?

Yeah, it is. Good point. But I've been told that such behavior is no longer acceptable here and I won't post that again.

You are right.
 
The average person doesn't want to buy life insurance either. But at least it is not a parade of bad news.

Both are great products and both have to be sold. Life insurance seems to be a no news industry and LTCi seems to be a "publish only the bad news" industry.

I don't feel either life or LTC has to be "sold."
Fairly easy transactions. Especially life insursnce. It's completely transactional. Everyone applies for it.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Both Al & Rick make some good points but it's very obvious that neither are LTC Specialists. By "Specialist" I mean someone who earns a minimum of 90% of their income selling LTCi.

Arthur, which of the following would you consider an " LTCI specialist."

Agent 1: Produces $60,000 LTC FYC year in year out. Writes no other products. Works for Acsia, LTCFP, or some other outfit.

Agent 2: Produces $250,000 traditional LTCi FYC year in year out; also Produces $250,000 Life Insurance FYC annually.

Agent 3: Produces $4,000,000 of Lincoln MoneyGuard premium annually. Also manages $100 Million AUM.

Of these 3 agents, who do you think might be the most competent in LTC knowledge and could properly hold themself out to the public as an LTC specialist?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Besides those who are not insurable and those who simply can't afford it, who else it is not appropriate for?


One major problem with the product is that people don't like paying money for something they don't think they will use.



What is needed is an LTC product where the client does not lose control of ALL the assets she pays in, perhaps similar to a WL or a VA or a fixed (indexed) annuity. And what is also needed is some guarantee that the $300 a day policy you buy now will still pay $300 a day ten years from now without an increase in premium (or cut in term) five years from now.

LTC is seen by many as a "gamble" where the deck is stacked totally in the house's favor.

LTC is such a flawed product in its design (not concept) that most people just don't want it. My hat is off to any agent who can make a full-time, sustainable living (say $75,000 FYC) in the LTC market.

Al

Al, I have no problem with your thoughts. I have heard similar thoughts expressed before.

In my experience I have generally found 2 types of people that buy long term care insurance.

A) Mom or dad needed care and the experience is the catalyst towards buying a policy so they don't have to burden family and can remain independent.

B) Planner type with trusted financial advisor recommending LTC planning be considered.

To me, these are the buyers of LTCi.

If someone has never had a personal experience with a close family member needing care; or if there is not a center of influence to help motivate the individual towards LTC planning the odds of writing the policy decrease significantly.

We can talk about price, and rate increases, and denial, and cynicism towards claims being paid all we want. But the reality is if either A or B above exists, none of these excuses ever come into play.

Just my thoughts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top