helpful_agent
New Member
- 6
Hi, all. I'm new here and greatly appreciate all the advice I've already found just by browsing through the forum. What a great environment!
I'm writing to find out whether any of you have recently experienced trying to cover any of the "autoimmune" syndromes like chronic epstein-barr (CAEBV), chronic mono (same thing), CFS, etc.
Most companies I work with define eligibility like this:
- 1 occurrence, no further symptoms = standard
- more than one occurrence, no further symptoms = case by case basis
- chronic, recurring = automatic decline
Here's what I don't get. My client handles symptoms herself. She knows there's no treatment/cure, so she doesn't go to the doctor for flare-ups. Her symptoms are relatively minor (fatigue, some muscle pain). Her medical record supports this "smart" approach to keeping costs contained. So, why would it be an automatic decline? The treatment is basically rest, vitamins, and exercise. No Rx costs.
I get the feeling these syndromes aren't covered because they're so "unknown" -- a little like HIV when it first appeared. They can't guarantee it won't turn into/be caused by something more serious, so they're leery of covering it. Is that the thinking on the part of the carriers?
Finally, does anyone know of a plan that will take chronic autoimmune syndromes as a rider? The client would be perfectly happy with that. Note: she is 30 and has no other medical conditions besides the occasional bronchitis/cold -- as we all do this time of year.
Thanks!
I'm writing to find out whether any of you have recently experienced trying to cover any of the "autoimmune" syndromes like chronic epstein-barr (CAEBV), chronic mono (same thing), CFS, etc.
Most companies I work with define eligibility like this:
- 1 occurrence, no further symptoms = standard
- more than one occurrence, no further symptoms = case by case basis
- chronic, recurring = automatic decline
Here's what I don't get. My client handles symptoms herself. She knows there's no treatment/cure, so she doesn't go to the doctor for flare-ups. Her symptoms are relatively minor (fatigue, some muscle pain). Her medical record supports this "smart" approach to keeping costs contained. So, why would it be an automatic decline? The treatment is basically rest, vitamins, and exercise. No Rx costs.
I get the feeling these syndromes aren't covered because they're so "unknown" -- a little like HIV when it first appeared. They can't guarantee it won't turn into/be caused by something more serious, so they're leery of covering it. Is that the thinking on the part of the carriers?
Finally, does anyone know of a plan that will take chronic autoimmune syndromes as a rider? The client would be perfectly happy with that. Note: she is 30 and has no other medical conditions besides the occasional bronchitis/cold -- as we all do this time of year.
Thanks!