- 7,066
I do listen to Frank, and that's the reason I responded back. After posting I realized the OP mentioned someone over 65.. I had thought about going back and reposting after realizing my answer addressed someone "aging in", but all the information got flushed through anyway. The only boo-boo in my response was saying GI vs. "open enrollment"....I said GI vs. "open enrollment" for Medigap which essentially means the same... wrong terminology for the purists....same "dag gan" result. But hey, I'll never confuse "open enrollment" for Medsups vs. AEP or OEP for MA's...OK??? Of course I didn't on my original post either.
All MA's are GI, and there other plans more appropriate for SNP's, QMBs. and SLMB's. Of course if all an agent cares to sell is the Medsup, then none of this matters. There are a lot of folks who desperately need help who happen to be in some of these conditional situations that might qualify them for some of these plans.
Let me say that I'd rather be a douche-bag (overwhelming opinion of Medsup pros on this forum) in trying to help someone who desperately needs that type of plan, instead of just saying to them, "Oh well, you can't afford a Medsup, sorry I cant' help you"
There is a lot of knowledge on this board, and sometimes even the most knowledgeable cut corners, and have posted wrong information. An honest mistake is OK, if you are man enough to swallow your pride and admit it.
Oh, regarding PDP's, I'll defer the next question to the more knowledgeable. I know there is a penalty for someone who doesn't sign up when they turn 65. I am not 100% sure if they still get hit with the penalty if they opt not to sign up and keep a group plan with creditable major med plan including Rx instead. It would seem to be a contradiction in having to carry 2 Rx plans, but I wouldn't put it past the geniuses at CMS to have some kind of screwy ruling on this. If someone knows the answer to this, please enlighten me.
I wasn't "busting your ass". I made the distinction between the two because those are the terms used by Medicare and the insurance companies. Although you are correct, either way the prospect gets to take a Med Supp without having to answer health questions.
An agent called me last month and was upset because he said he lost a sale. He said he called the insurance company and asked for information on their "guaranteed issue" Med Supps. They told him they didn't have any "guaranteed issue" Med Supps and that ended the conversation.
He really wanted information about selling a policy under "Open Enrollment" but used the term "guaranteed issue" instead. If he had used the correct terminology he would have gotten the information he needed and probably made the sale. By the time he found out the difference and contacted the prospect she had already taken a policy with another agent. It was with that in mind that I made the comment.
I have never, nor would I ever refer to someone who sells MA plans as a "douche-bag". The only Part C plan I can sell in rural Missouri is a PFFS plan. I don't sell them because I don't believe they are in my clients best interest. I personally believe that they would be better off just having Medicare Part A and B and the flexibility it provides. I explain in detail why I am suggesting that to them. That view is shared by many other agents in Missouri who also only sell in rural areas. If they still want a PFFS plan then I refer them to an agent who I know will take good care of them.
I don't prospect in low income areas so I rarely encounter people who are destitute. If I did, I may take a different approach.