B
Briefcaseboy
Guest
Actually, I just thought of something. Lets say the husband is insurable but the wife isn't. Say, well the man is the bread winner, got to insure him because if he goes into a nursing home, the state will do a spend down on his income which the wife depends on, so he is the one who needs the LTCi......reverse the scenario.......The wife is insurable but the man isn't. Say, well the wife usually lives longer than the husband, when his health fails she will take care of him until he dies, then when her health fails there is no one there to help her, so she is the one who needs the LTCi. Is that kinda like Abbott and Costello...who's on first and who's on second.