How to fund a college education

While WL is not the ultimate investment it is one of the major ones and should be in everyones portfolio to one degree or another. Most FP'ers or nearly all I talk to would agree with that statement, may they be a CFP or ChFC what have you. Yet, it is important to pick a good one, such as the major Mutuals as they tend to be the cheapest in the long run.
 
"I would not say that Whole Life Insurance is an excellent investment. I have never said that in 27 years in the business and probably never will."

Well that would be your loss, wouldn't it? Do you feel annuities are a bad choice as well?

Who said whole life insurance was a "bad" choice? I said it is NOT an excellent investment. And it isn't.



Do you sell Bonds? All a whole life basically is is a secure bond fund with a death benefit. The good ones, don't go backwards, you can't lose what you've gained, plus how an investment is viewed by uncle bucks is important too.

I sure hope they don't go backwards.


All I know from my 20 years is that they work for me. It an investment I don't have to worry about compared to others and is a part of my balanced portfolio. Is it the only thing I do? no. but it is one of the safest ones I have. The last five years the market hasn't been too kind to my equities, kinda nice to see something plugging along that hasn't lost 10-15% during a market cycle.

I agree that they are safe. But getting back to the original topic...I never use them for college funding.

And sorry...but the notion that a whole life policy is an "excellent investment" is quite harebrained. It is an insurance policy that can generate a competitive rate of return (long-term). I have no problem recommending them to clients, but it is always considered as a separate entity when evaluating one's investment portfolio. If a significant amount of cash is removed from the policy, it obviously affects the death benefit quite a bit.

Or...put another way...if someone stops by my office and says they would like to invest some money...whole life insurance is at the bottom of my list...unless a financial analysis dictates that it makes sense.


nm
 
"I agree that they are safe. But getting back to the original topic...I never use them for college funding. "

Have you experienced FASFA?

Remember it's the old saying it's not what you make, it's what you keep. Modified slightly to include.. what you have to declare as well.

An advantage to cash value is they don't increase your EFC like a 529 and other investments. As I said, just did it, works pretty good. Especially since our investments stalled or decreased over the past few years when we needed the funds to perform. the nice 5-7% from the life return didn't hurt, when the market when backwards. It felt better when I didn't have to tell the government or the schools what the values were so they could calculate what we should pay. It's still not what you make, it's what you get to keep. I guess we just have a different perspective and experiences. For us it worked OK.
 
If the market is moving backwards, then I'll reluctantly agree that (in retrospect) the WL option is a good option. But over most (if not all) 10-15 year periods, the market has not moved backwards.

As for our experiences, our kids aren't in college yet, so you have the experience edge there. I'm using the 529 option. Of course, two athletic schollies would take care of everything.
 
"As for our experiences, our kids aren't in college yet, so you have the experience edge there. I'm using the 529 option. Of course, two athletic schollies would take care of everything."

Try the nation merit route, we picked up about a quarter mil for both and if either blows a knee, they still keep the money. They just need to do their homework.

The tough part about the savings aspect is the FASFA, Unless you're willing to pay full price, every college wants you to take it. From that, grants, staford loans (subs and unsubbed) and work study are calculated.
The hard part about the 529's and other savings choices, is just when your patting yourself on the back for doing them and getting solid returns, the expected family contribution jumps up and takes away work study, staford and any grants. It's like the colleges say thank you for saving so well, make the check out to....

The FASFA in essence does punish those who save via declarable methods vs. methods they don't ask about.

And yes, wl works best if you've had it a long while, in our case before kids. I agree about market cycles and their impact on investment.

I tend to run into two types of client college planners, those from birth and those whose kids are juniors in HS. Ants and grasshoppers. With those who have time, we look at several options and the net effect. Those without, we look at what they have done sofar or scale back plans to a state school.

It's getting harder and harder for kids to do college without loans anyway. Private tuition, R&B is running about 40-45k, and state schools are pushing 25-30k. Med school for my S, is going to run 65k a year. The reality we have to face is college costs are rising much faster than anybody's investment portfoilio. So while it may not be fancy or flashy something like a wl could appeal because it isn't a strike against you when they tally up assets.
 
I noticed no one recommended an UTMA account or UGMA (depending on your location).

Grandma can put an amount of money in an UTMA and retains custodial control... it can be used for anything as long as it is for the benefit of the child.

It is not tax deferred or tax free - however, it does enjoy a bit of favorable tax treatment.

The underlying vehicle can be equities or CD's or a money market...

If the child doesn't go to school Grandma can still spend the money for the child's benefit, clothes, car, etc

Grandma can still take advantage of a gift... $11k this year i think... or Grandma could gift that much every year leading up to and through college if Grandma has the money to spare...

I don't know a whole lot about FSFA - but doesn't parents income limit the bene's a child can receive? So, if you can afford to 'fully fund' a cash value policy then you must be making decent coin - maybe enough to impair your ability to qualify anyway...

someone said: "Yes, whole life is an EXCELLENT choice IF you have time to let it work" yes - because you need all the time to overcome the negative return or even to get to break even when you consider a straight investment...

Cash Value is always a poor choice for investing... IMO...

hope this helps Al...

Idea



 
If the market is moving backwards, then I'll reluctantly agree that (in retrospect) the WL option is a good option. But over most (if not all) 10-15 year periods, the market has not moved backwards.
I was reading through a thread and noticed this statement made almost two years ago. Interesting how things can change.

We now have at least one ten year period where the market went backwards.
 
"Interesting how things can change."

Yes, I'd agree.... except FASFA still sucks and it sucks worse now.

It's too bad some can't do the FASFA as a testing opportunity to see exactly how it works for and against you with certain investment opportunities. I do think it might change some opinions if you plug in your theories and see how uncle bucks aunt (FASFA) views them.

Nothing enlightens like that last page of the FASFA where it states family obligation is xxxx...
 
Back
Top