- 10,809
just to update folks
ive contacted the insurance company. the plan is even set up worse than i thought...bc the annuity is also paid monthly there is a 5% charge on that as well and thus i also lose money every year on the annuity portion alone.
fortunately the agent had sent me an email saying how great of a deal this is to get the WL for so cheap (so i have documentation) saying i could end the plan after 3 years for the NITR value (which isnt true of course) and they are deciding with how to deal with this issue.
does anyone know if there is an irs issue for just ending the plan after 1 year?
If there is my other thought are to have them reduce the defined benefit every year (making almost no contributions on the next few) until i get to the point where i can safely terminate the plan.
You need to find a good Tax Attorney to represent you in this matter, along with an independent agent who has experience in this field.
If their really was gross misrepresentation, then a civil attorney experienced in insurance litigation might be in order.
I have no idea what was or wasnt said, and if the product truly was misrepresented (Im not doubting you; it sounds like it probably was, but I know from experience that clients forget a lot of what was talked about a year+ later).
But if it was misrepresented to the extent that you claim, then you might have cause to be compensated for any direct loss or indirect loss (lost opportunity of gains).
I will say that if your ultimate goal behind purchasing the 412i was to pay for college and special needs costs associated with your kids, then the 412i was most likely not an appropriate choice.
The email you can produce is pretty damning evidence. Any documented misrepresentation is a strong piece of evidence on your side.
My goal (if I where you) would be to recoup from the company: premiums paid plus a minimum of 4% compounding (preferably 5%), any IRS fees/penalties/taxes, and any professional fees that you have to pay in the process to lawyers or other advisors.
But of course this is only if the product was grossly misrepresented, structured, or administered.
(They might even agree to this with just the mention of contacting a civil attorney)
Again, what company is it with?
Someone on here might very well have experience with 412i plans with this company, or at least have access to some more in depth info about the specific plan (features can vary from company to company).
You will not be badmouthing them, because really what you are claiming is that the agent misrepresented the product, not the company. (plus companies get badmouthed on here by us agents all the time... lol)
Any way you go about it, you need an advocate on your side who is experienced in both tax law and 412i plans.
So this means that you will probably have to find two different advisors to help represent you (the tax attorney and an independent agent).