Information

[panzercanvasser]

Yeah, that's kinda what it was!!

It was also a frickin joke!!

When you say that’s “kinda” what it was- does that mean you’re giving yourself enough room to save face for the event that you’re wrong? Or is “kinda” just an extra word you threw in there- and you’re firmly asserting that this account is Doug, not one of his tenured downlines?

Is that also why you added that “it was also a frickin joke”- to save a little face in the event that you’re wrong? Or are you saying that you do firmly assert that this account belongs to Doug and upon your assumption of that conclusion it becomes a self-contained “joke” of some type?

 

[panzercanvasser]

Yes Doug, that's what JD was insinuating.

Are you saying this because you had communication with JD outside of this thread and it’s your role to provide a more resolute answer than what he did in his reply? The one with the “kinda” and the “joke”.

I saw you liked his original, superfluous or otherwise attention-seeking reply to my rather straightforward response to the OP. So in the instance the answer to my above question is “no”- are you saying that as a way of doubling down because it would contradict your own personal expectation of this account belonging to Doug?

 

[jdeasy]

When you say that’s “kinda” what it was- does that mean you’re giving yourself enough room to save face for the event that you’re wrong? Or is “kinda” just an extra word you threw in there- and you’re firmly asserting that this account is Doug, not one of his tenured downlines?

Is that also why you added that “it was also a frickin joke”- to save a little face in the event that you’re wrong? Or are you saying that you do firmly assert that this account belongs to Doug and upon your assumption of that conclusion it becomes a self-contained “joke” of some type?

WTF is wrong with you?? Save face from what?

Hurting your feelings? Get over it!

 

[goillini52]

Are you saying this because you had communication with JD outside of this thread and it’s your role to provide a more resolute answer than what he did in his reply? The one with the “kinda” and the “joke”.

I saw you liked his original, superfluous or otherwise attention-seeking reply to my rather straightforward response to the OP. So in the instance the answer to my above question is “no”- are you saying that as a way of doubling down because it would contradict your own personal expectation of this account belonging to Doug?

Lighten up Francis. Your word salad reminds me of Kameltoe.

You need to get you a sense of humor.

 

[panzercanvasser]

WTF is wrong with you?? Save face from what?

Hurting your feelings? Get over it!

When you ask “WTF is wrong with you”- what exactly are you referencing? Or is that just an ad hominem?

Let’s break down the question of you saving face. I gave a testimonial to being Doug’s downline for several years. This was to help give OP relevant feedback to his specific question. You were incredulous and made the public accusation that this account belongs to Doug or would be Doug under a secondary account, but gave no evidence. This all distracted from the topic of the thread and the serious discussion relevant to this man’s career. Let’s say I ghosted the conversation after you made your accusation or responded in a defensive manner- regardless of any evidence being provided that this is a secondary account of Doug’s there would be reason for spectators to believe that your accusation was correct. You would have gained some sort of “win” in your calling someone out on creating a fake account to give a testimonial.

However, it didn’t go like that. You made a mockery of a serious question OP had that is of importance to his career, accused an agency owner of creating a fake account to give a fake testimonial, and didn’t answer a single question I posed. Unless you can start supplying answers to the questions I posed then I will say that you have no honor, and someone’s dishonor being exposed is enough to have them clamor to save face by claiming their otherwise serious accusation was “a joke” and deflecting. Does that answer your question?